David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 42 (1-2):44- (1948)
The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to a similarity between an ancient and a modern theory of living nature. There is no need to present the Aristotelian doctrine in full detail. I must rather apologize for repeating much that is well known. My endeavour is to offer it for comparison, and, incidentally, to clear it from misrepresentation. Uexküll's theory, on the other hand, is little known, and what is given here is an insufficient outline of it. I do not maintain that either doctrine is right. I am fully aware that the problem of the essence of living nature by no means admits of an éasy solution. In offering for consideration the comparison contained in this paper I would go no farther than owning my belief that the two authors here discussed, both thinkers who combine an intensely philosophical outlook with a wide biological experience, are worth the attention not only of the historian of science and philosophy, but also of the student of philosophical biology
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rich Cameron (2010). Aristotle's Teleology. Philosophy Compass 5 (12):1096-1106.
Monte Ransome Johnson (2005). Aristotle on Teleology. Oxford University Press.
Mariska Leunissen (2010). Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle's Science of Nature. Cambridge University Press.
Jui-Pi Chien (2004). Schema as Both the Key to and the Puzzle of Life. Sign Systems Studies 32 (1-2):187-207.
Mariska Elisabeth Maria Philomena Johannes Leunissen, Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle's Philosophy of Nature.
Christopher V. Mirus (2012). Aristotle on Beauty and Goodness in Nature. International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (1):79-97.
James G. Lennox (1984). Marjorie Grene, Aristotle's Philosophy of Science and Aristotle's Biology. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:365 - 377.
Mariska Leunissen (forthcoming). Biology and Teleology in Aristotle’s Account of the City. In Julius Rocca (ed.), Teleology in the Ancient World: The Dispensation of Nature. Cambridge
Mathias Gutmann (2004). Uexküll and Contemporary Biology. Sign Systems Studies 32 (1-2):169-185.
F. J. K. Soontiëns (1991). Evolution: Teleology or Chance? [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 22 (1):133-141.
Jeffrey Wattles (2006). Teleology Past and Present. Zygon 41 (2):445-464.
Stephen B. Hawkins (2007). Desire and Natural Classification: Aristotle and Peirce on Final Cause. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (3):521 - 541.
Gordon Haist (1989). Aristotle on Nature and Living Things Allan Gotthelf (Ed.): Aristotle on Nature and Living Things. Philosophical and Historical Studies Presented to David M. Balme on His Seventieth Birthday. Pp. Xxiii + 410; 1 Plate. Pittsburg, PA and Bristol: Mathesis Publications and Bristol Classical Press, 1985. £27 (Paper, £12.95). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 39 (01):45-46.
Tobias Cheung (2004). From Protoplasm to Umwelt. Sign Systems Studies 32 (1-2):139-166.
Prisca Augustyn (2009). Translating Jakob von Uexküll — Reframing Umweltlehre as Biosemiotics. Sign Systems Studies 37 (1-2):281-297.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads16 ( #239,591 of 1,934,421 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #113,194 of 1,934,421 )
How can I increase my downloads?