Graduate studies at Western
HEC Forum 23 (3):207-224 (2011)
|Abstract||Moral case deliberation (MCD) is a form of clinical ethics support in which the ethicist as facilitator aims at supporting professionals with a structured moral inquiry into their moral issues from practice. Cases often affect clients, however, their inclusion in MCD is not common. Client participation often raises questions concerning conditions for equal collaboration and good dialogue. Despite these questions, there is little empirical research regarding client participation in clinical ethics support in general and in MCD in particular. This article aims at describing the experiences and processes of two MCD groups with client participation in a mental healthcare institution. A responsive evaluation was conducted examining stakeholders’ issues concerning client participation. Findings demonstrate that participation initially creates uneasiness. As routine builds up and client participants meet certain criteria, both clients and professionals start thinking beyond ‘us-them’ distinctions, and become more equal partners in dialogue. Still, sentiments of distrust and feelings of not being safe may reoccur. Client participation in MCD thus requires continuous reflection and alertness on relational dynamics and the quality of and conditions for dialogue. Participation puts the essentials of MCD (i.e., dialogue) to the test. Yet, the methodology and features of MCD offer an appropriate platform to introduce client participation in healthcare institutions|
|Keywords||Moral case deliberation Client participation Dialogue Inclusion Organization|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
F. C. Weidema, A. C. Molewijk, G. A. M. Widdershoven & T. A. Abma (2012). Enacting Ethics: Bottom-Up Involvement in Implementing Moral Case Deliberation. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 20 (1):1-19.
Vivianne Baur, Tineke Abma & Ingrid Baart (forthcoming). “I Stand Alone.” An Ethnodrama About the (Dis)Connections Between a Client and Professionals in a Residential Care Home. Health Care Analysis:1-20.
S. Dam, T. A. Abma, M. J. M. Kardol & G. A. M. Widdershoven (2012). “Here's My Dilemma”. Moral Case Deliberation as a Platform for Discussing Everyday Ethics in Elderly Care. Health Care Analysis 20 (3):250-267.
Stephan Cludts (1999). Organisation Theory and the Ethics of Participation. Journal of Business Ethics 21 (2-3):157 - 171.
Rachel Winograd (2011). The Balance Between Providing Support, Prolonging Suffering, and Promoting Death: Ethical Issues Surrounding Psychological Treatment of a Terminally Ill Client. Ethics and Behavior 22 (1):44 - 59.
Merel Visse, Guy A. M. Widdershoven & Tineke A. Abma (2012). Moral Learning in an Integrated Social and Healthcare Service Network. Health Care Analysis 20 (3):281-296.
Maurice Berix (2012). YUTPA as a Design Tool for Public Participation. AI and Society 27 (1):165-172.
Verle E. Headings (1987). Models of the Relationship Between Genetic Counselor and Client. Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 8 (2):120-128.
Beverly E. Thorn, Nancy J. Rubin, Angela J. Holderby & R. Clayton Shealy (1996). Client-Therapist Intimacy: Responses of Psychotherapy Clients to a Consumer-Oriented Brochure. Ethics and Behavior 6 (1):17 – 28.
Michael Zschiesche (2012). Assessing Project Approval Procedures as Formalised Forms of Public Participation. Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):145-156.
Stephen Murgatroyd (1974). Ethical Issues in Secondary School Counselling. Journal of Moral Education 4 (1):27-37.
Thomas Saretzki (2012). Legitimation Problems of Participatory Processes in Technology Assessment and Technology Policy. Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):7-26.
Added to index2011-07-27
Total downloads3 ( #213,563 of 739,303 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,303 )
How can I increase my downloads?