Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):280-281 (2002)
|Abstract||Rachlin favors following patterns over making decisions case by case. However, his accounts of self-control and altruism do not establish the rationality of making decisions according to patterns. The best arguments for using patterns as a standard of evaluation appeal to savings in cognitive costs and compensation for irrational dispositions. What the arguments show depends on how they are elaborated and refined.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert E. Goodin & Christian List, A Conditional Defense of Plurality Rule: Generalizing May's Theorem in a Restricted Informational Environment.
Ged M. Murtagh (2004). The Limits of Reproductive Decisions. Human Studies 27 (4):417 - 427.
Jan Sprenger (2010). Probability, Rational Single-Case Decisions and the Monty Hall Problem. Synthese 174 (3).
Mathias Risse (2004). Arguing for Majority Rule. Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (1):41–64.
Paul Weirich (1986). Expected Utility and Risk. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):419-442.
Percy Black (1993). Extraneous Intrusions in Moral Temptation Can Switch Decisions. Journal of Moral Education 22 (2):139-156.
Mehmet Bac & Parimal Kanti Bag (2002). Committee Decisions with Partisans and Side-Transfers. Theory and Decision 52 (3):267-286.
Ralph Wedgwood (1998). The Fundamental Principle of Practical Reasoning. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (2):189 – 209.
Evelyn C. Hume, Ernest R. Larkins & Govind Iyer (1999). On Compliance with Ethical Standards in Tax Return Preparation. Journal of Business Ethics 18 (2):229 - 238.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #232,382 of 549,069 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?