Induction and inference to the best explanation

Philosophical Studies 166 (1):203-216 (2013)
Abstract
In this paper I adduce a new argument in support of the claim that IBE is an autonomous (indispensable) form of inference, based on a familiar, yet surprisingly, under-discussed, problem for Hume’s theory of induction. I then use some insights thereby gleaned to argue for the (reductionist) claim that induction is really IBE, and draw some normative conclusions
Keywords Induction  Inference to the best explanation  Scepticism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    Tim Black (2007). The Distinction Between Coherence and Constancy in Hume's Treatise I.Iv. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (1):1 – 25.

    View all 50 references

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Alexander Bird (2005). Abductive Knowledge and Holmesian Inference. In Tamar Szabo Gendler John Hawthorne (ed.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology. Oxford University Press. 1--31.
    Alexander Bird (2005). Abductive Knowledge and Holmesian Inference. In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology. Oxford University Press. 1--31.
    John D. Norton (2003). A Material Theory of Induction. Philosophy of Science 70 (4):647-670.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2012-10-01

    Total downloads

    174 ( #2,827 of 1,088,810 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    63 ( #636 of 1,088,810 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.