Graduate studies at Western
Essays in Philosophy 13 (1) (2012)
|Abstract||The practice of appealing to esoteric intuitions, long standard in analytic philosophy, has recently fallen on hard times. Various recent empirical results have suggested that philosophers are not currently able to distinguish good intuitions from bad. This paper evaluates one possible type of approach to this problematic methodological situation: calibration. Both critiquing and building on an argument from Robert Cummins, the paper explores what possible avenues may exist for the calibration of philosophical intuitions. It is argued that no good options are currently available, but leaves open the real possibility of such a calibration in the future.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Frank Lad (1984). The Calibration Question. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (3):213-221.
Teddy Seidenfeld (1985). Calibration, Coherence, and Scoring Rules. Philosophy of Science 52 (2):274-294.
Jeffrey Maynes (2012). Linguistic Intuition and Calibration. Linguistics and Philosophy 35 (5):443-460.
Daniel Steel (2001). Bayesian Statistics in Radiocarbon Calibration. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S153-.
Robert A. Skipper (2004). Calibration of Laboratory Models in Population Genetics. Perspectives on Science 12 (4):369-393.
J. Williamson (2012). Calibration and Convexity: Response to Gregory Wheeler. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (4):851-857.
Michael H. Brill (1999). A Wiring Demon Meets Socialized Humans and Calibrated Photometers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):948-949.
Gregory Wheeler (2012). Objective Bayesian Calibration and the Problem of Non-Convex Evidence. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (4):841-850.
Ilan Fischer & Ravid Bogaire (2012). The Group Calibration Index: A Group-Based Approach for Assessing Forecasters' Expertise When External Outcome Data Are Missing. [REVIEW] Theory and Decision 73 (4):671-685.
K. Steele & C. Werndl (2013). Climate Models, Calibration, and Confirmation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (3):609-635.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads73 ( #14,063 of 738,458 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,458 )
How can I increase my downloads?