Indiscriminate evidence, easy knowledge
Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Offers a diagnosis of the easy knowledge problem, according to which easy knowledge is unjustified belief because the inferences that deliver easy knowledge feign evidential support that is not actually there. This diagnosis leads to a rejection of Closure. But, I argue, this rejection of Closure is more plausible than the traditional one endorsed by tracking theorists. I also argue that my diagnosis suggests a general plausibility argument against Closure, since a number of epistemic goods traditionally associated with knowledge do not transfer across known entailments. Finally, I defend Anti-Closure against two recent objections.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Hamid Vahid (2007). Varieties of Easy Knowledge Inference: A Resolution. [REVIEW] Acta Analytica 22 (3):223-237.
Peter J. Markie (2005). Easy Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):406–416.
P. Baumann (2006). Information, Closure, and Knowledge: On Jäger's Objection to Dretske. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 64 (3):403 - 408.
Ram Neta (2005). A Contextualist Solution to the Problem of Easy Knowledge. Grazer Philosophische Studien 69 (1):183-206.
Scott Scheall (2011). Later Wittgenstein and the Problem of Easy Knowledge. Philosophical Investigations 34 (3):268-286.
Kelly Becker (2012). Basic Knowledge and Easy Understanding. Acta Analytica 27 (2):145-161.
Tim Black (2008). Solving the Problem of Easy Knowledge. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):597-617.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #131,771 of 739,317 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?