David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The paper discusses the invariance view of reality: a view inspired by the relativity and quantum theory. It is an attempt to show that both versions of Structural Realism (epistemological and ontological) are already embedded in the invariance view but in each case the invariance view introduces important modifications. From the invariance view we naturally arrive at a consideration of symmetries and structures. It is often claimed that there is a strong connection between invariance and reality, established by symmetries. The invariance view seems to render frame-invariant properties real, while frame-specific properties are illusory. But on a perspectival, yet observer-free view of frame-specific realities they too must be regarded as real although supervenient on frame-invariant realities. Invariance and perspectivalism are thus two faces of symmetries. Symmetries also elucidate structures. Because of this recognition, the invariance view is more comprehensive than Structural Realism. Referring to broken symmetries and coherence considerations, the paper concludes that at least some symmetries are ontological, not just epistemological constraints.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Denis Bonnay (2006). Logicality and Invariance. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (1):29-68.
Victor J. Stenger (2006). The Comprehensible Cosmos: Where Do the Laws of Physics Come From? Prometheus Books.
Holger Lyre (2009). Structural Realism and Abductive-Transcendental Arguments. In P. Kerszberg, J. Petitot & M. Bitbol (eds.), Constituting Objectivity. Transcendental Perspectives on Modern Physics.
Brigitte Hösli & Gerhard Jäger (1994). About Some Symmetries of Negation. Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (2):473-485.
Peter Kosso (2000). The Epistemology of Spontaneously Broken Symmetries. Synthese 122 (3):359 - 376.
Gordon Belot (2005). Dust, Time and Symmetry. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2):255 - 291.
Sebastian Lutz & Stephan Hartmann (2010). Conventional and Objective Invariance: Debs and Redhead on Symmetry. [REVIEW] Metascience 19:15-23.
John T. Roberts (2008). A Puzzle About Laws, Symmetries and Measurability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (2):143-168.
Victor J. Stenger (1987). Was the Universe Created? Free Inquiry 7 (3):26-30.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads61 ( #72,425 of 1,911,732 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #180,473 of 1,911,732 )
How can I increase my downloads?