David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (1):101-116 (2004)
This article discusses Heidegger’s lecture course Grundbegriffe der aristotelischen Philosophie, which focuses on Aristotle’s conception of the relationbetween the essence of man, logos, and the being of the world, kinesis. It is argued that the overall aim of Heidegger’s interpretation is to show that, on the one hand, it is Aristotle’s insight into the nature of logos that has made possible the great achievement of the Physics: the explication of being in terms of kinesis or movement; but that, on the other hand, the concept of kinesis in its turn leads Aristotle to a notion of being as perfect presence, entelecheia, which proves to have problematic consequences for his concept of logos. Heidegger’s own project is then presented as a critical retrieval of Aristotle’s understanding of the relation between logos and kinesis
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jussi Backman (2005). Divine and Mortal Motivation: On the Movement of Life in Aristotle and Heidegger. Continental Philosophy Review 38 (3-4):241-261.
Francisco J. Gonzalez (2006). Whose Metaphysics of Presence? Heidegger's Interpretation ofEnergeiaandDunamisin Aristotle. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (4):533-568.
Marjolein Oele (2012). Heidegger's Reading of Aristotle's Concept of Pathos. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):389-406.
Ammon Allred (2009). The Divine Logos. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (1):1-18.
Albert Rijksbaron (1989). Aristotle, Verb Meaning and Functional Grammar: Towards a New Typology of States of Affairs: With an Appendix on Aristotle's Distinction Between Kinesis and Energeia. Gieben.
Friederike Rese (2005). Praxis and Logos in Aristotle. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (2):359-377.
Alexander P. D. Mourelatos (1993). Aristotle's Kinêsis/Energeia Distinction: A Marginal Note on Kathleen Gill's Paper. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):385 - 388.
Carl Erik Kühl (2008). Kinesis and Energeia—and What Follows. Outline of a Typology of Human Actions. Axiomathes 18 (3):303-338.
Ashok K. Gangadean (2008). Meditations on Global First Philosophy: Quest for the Missing Grammar of Logos. State University of New York Press.
Fatma Pinar Canevi (2007). The Conception of Logos as the Foundation of Human Dignity. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:11-19.
Stuart Elden (2005). Reading Logos as Speech: Heidegger, Aristotle and Rhetorical Politics. Philosophy and Rhetoric 38 (4):281-301.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads24 ( #196,700 of 1,932,452 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #225,373 of 1,932,452 )
How can I increase my downloads?