David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):223-227 (2002)
As Kenneth Pimple points out, scientists’ responsibilities to the larger society have received less attention than ethical issues internal to the practice of science. Yet scientists and specialists who study science have begun to provide analyses of the foundations and scope of scientsts’ responsibilities to society. An account of contributions from Kristen Shrader-Frechette, Melanie Leitner, Ullica Segerstråle, John Ahearne, Helen Longino, and Carl Cranor offers work on scientists’ social responsibilities upon which to build.
|Keywords||social responsibility of scientists norms standards scientists’ roles|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Kenneth D. Pimple (2002). Six Domains of Research Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):191-205.
Kristin Shrader-Frechette (1996). Ethics of Scientific Research. Noûs 30 (1):133-143.
Vivian Weil (1996). Book Review:Ethics of Scientific Research. Kristin Shrader-Frechette. [REVIEW] Ethics 106 (4):879-.
Citations of this work BETA
Henk Zandvoort, Tom Børsen, Michael Deneke & Stephanie J. Bird (2013). Editors' Overview Perspectives on Teaching Social Responsibility to Students in Science and Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (4):1413-1438.
Wha-Chul Son (2008). Philosophy of Technology and Macro-Ethics in Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):405-415.
Sheila Slaughter & Gary Rhoades (2010). The Social Construction of Copyright Ethics and Values. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2):263-293.
Frazier Benya (2011). The Need for Topically Focused Efforts to Deal with the Long-Term Social Implications of Research. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (5):19-20.
Similar books and articles
Stephanie J. Bird (2002). Responsibilities of Scientists and Engineers: Theory and Practice. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):130-130.
Barbara Nicholas (2001). Exploring a Moral Landscape: Genetic Science and Ethics. Hypatia 16 (1):45-63.
Edward J. Hackett (2002). Four Observations About “Six Domains of Research Ethics”. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):211-214.
Steven Yearley (2005). Making Sense of Science: Understanding the Social Study of Science. Sage Publications.
Nicholas Evans (2010). Speak No Evil: Scientists, Responsibility, and the Public Understanding of Science. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 4 (3):215-220.
Penny J. Gilmer & Michael DuBois (2002). Teaching Social Responsibility: The Manhattan Project. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):206-210.
Kevin C. Elliott (2006). An Ethics of Expertise Based on Informed Consent. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (4):637-661.
Robert McGinn (2010). Ethical Responsibilities of Nanotechnology Researchers: A Short Guide. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 4 (1):1-12.
Stanley Joel Reiser & Ruth E. Bulger (1997). The Social Responsibilities of Biological Scientists. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):137-143.
Michael Strevens (2006). The Role of the Matthew Effect in Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37 (2):159-170.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads108 ( #34,714 of 1,793,059 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #169,529 of 1,793,059 )
How can I increase my downloads?