Graduate studies at Western
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 77 (77):47-72 (2003)
|Abstract||[Alan Weir] This paper addresses the problem of how to account for objective content-for the distinction between how we actually apply terms and the conditions in which we ought to apply them-from within a naturalistic framework. Though behaviourist or dispositionalist approaches are generally held to be unsuccessful in naturalising objective content or 'normativity', I attempt to restore the credibility of such approaches by sketching a behaviouristic programme for explicating objective content. /// [Alexander Miller] Paul Boghossian (1989, 1990) has argued, on grounds concerning the holistic nature of belief fixation, that there are principled reasons for thinking that 'optimal conditions' versions of reductive dispositionalism about content cannot hope to satisfy a condition of extensional accuracy. I discern three separable strands of argument in Boghossian's work-the circularity objection, the open-endedness objection, and the certification objection-and argue that each of these objections fails. My conclusion is that for all that Boghossian has shown, 'optimal conditions' versions of reductive dispositionalism have to be assessed on a case-by-case basis|
|Keywords||Behaviorism Content Language Objective Quine|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nicholas Georgalis (2007). First-Person Methodologies: A View From Outside the Phenomenological Tradition. Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (S1):93-112.
Alexander Miller (1997). Boghossian on Reductive Dispositionalism About Content: The Case Strengthened. Mind and Language 12 (1):1-10.
Sven Rosenkranz (2011). Objective Content. Erkenntnis 74 (2):177-206.
Christopher Peacocke (2001). Phenomenology and Nonconceptual Content. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):609-615.
Alexander Miller (2003). Does "Belief Holism" Show That Reductive Dispositionalism About Content Could Not Be True? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 77 (77):73-90.
Josefa Toribio (1997). Twin Pleas: Probing Content and Compositionality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):871-89.
Anandi Hattiangadi (2006). Is Meaning Normative? Mind and Language 21 (2):220-240.
Pascal Engel (2002). The Norms of Thought: Are They Social? Mind and Society 2 (3):129-148.
Alexander Miller (2003). Objective Content. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):73–90.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #107,422 of 723,496 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 723,496 )
How can I increase my downloads?