Graduate studies at Western
Erkenntnis 43 (1):67-79 (1995)
|Abstract||There are arguments which purport to rebut psychological determinism by appealing to its alleged incompatibility with rationality. I argue that they all fail. Against Davidson, I argue that rationality does not preclude the existence of psychological laws. Against Popper, I argue that rationality is compatible with the possibility of predicting human actions. Against Schlesinger, I claim that Newcomb's problem cannot be invoked to show that human actions are unpredictable. Having vindicated the possibility of a rationally-based theory of action, I consider the form it might take|
|Keywords||Determinism Metaphysics Psychology Rationality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Gl (1977). Ii. The Rationality Principle and Action Explanations: Koertge's Reconstruction of Popper's Logic of Action Explanations. Inquiry 20 (1-4):72 – 81.
John Heil (1985). Rationality and Psychological Explanation. Inquiry 28 (1-4):359 – 371.
Patrick Rysiew (2008). Rationality Disputes – Psychology and Epistemology. Philosophy Compass 3 (6):1153-1176.
Xavier Vanmechelen (1998). Does Rationality Presuppose Irrationality. Philosophical Explorations 1 (2):126 – 139.
Danny Frederick (2013). Popper, Rationality and the Possibility of Social Science. THEORIA 28 (1):61-75.
Edward F. Walter & Arthur Minton (1975). Soft Determinism, Freedom, and Rationality. Personalist 56:364-384.
Robert Klee (1992). Anomalous Monism, Ceteris Paribus, and Psychological Explanation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (3):389-403.
Peter Glück & Michael Schmid (1977). II. The Rationality Principle and Action Explanations: Koertge's Reconstruction of Popper's Logic of Action Explanations. Inquiry 20 (1-4):72-81.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #57,941 of 741,159 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,802 of 741,159 )
How can I increase my downloads?