David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (1998)
In this book, Roslyn Weiss contends that, contrary to prevailing notions, Plato's Crito does not show an allegiance between Socrates and the state that condemned him. Denying that the speech of the Laws represents the views of Socrates, Weiss deftly brings to light numerous indications that Socrates provides to the attentive reader that he and the Laws are not partners but antagonists in the argument and that he is singularly unimpressed by the case against escaping prison presented by the Laws. Weiss's greatest innovation is her contention that the Laws are very much like the judges who preside at Socrates' trail--interested not in justice and truth but in being shown deference and submission. If Weiss's argument is correct, then the standard conception of the history of political thought is in error--political philosophy begins not with the primacy of the state over the citizen but with the affirmation of the individual's duty to act in accordance with his own careful determination of what justice demands.
|Keywords||Obedience Law Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$25.78 used (76% off) $64.59 new (39% off) $99.61 direct from Amazon (6% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B368.W45 1998|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Thomas F. Morris (2014). Why Socrates Does Not Request Exile in the Apology. Heythrop Journal 55 (1):73-85.
Similar books and articles
Roslyn Weiss (1994). Virtue Without Knowledge: Socrates' Conception of Holiness in Plato's Euthyphro. Ancient Philosophy 14 (2):263-282.
Sandra Peterson (2011). Socrates and Philosophy in the Dialogues of Plato. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas C. Brickhouse (2004). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Plato and the Trial of Socrates. Routledge.
J. Dybikowski (1974). Socrates, Obedience, and the Law: Plato's Crito. Dialogue 13 (03):519-535.
Richard W. Momeyer (1982). Socrates on Obedience and Disobedience to the Law. Philosophy Research Archives 8:21-53.
Richard Kraut (1981). Plato's Apology and Crito: Two Recent Studies:Socrates: Philosophy in Plato's Early Dialogues. Gerasimos Xenophon Santas; Law and Obedience: The Arguments of Plato's Crito. A. D. Woozley. [REVIEW] Ethics 91 (4):651-.
Christopher Moore (2011). Socratic Persuasion in the Crito. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1021 - 1046.
M. McAvoy (1999). Review. Socrates Dissatisfied. An Analysis of Plato's Crito. R Weiss. The Classical Review 49 (2):436-437.
Ernest J. Weinrib (1982). Obedience to the Law in Plato's Crito. American Journal of Jurisprudence 27 (1):85-108.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #47,251 of 1,679,369 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #48,360 of 1,679,369 )
How can I increase my downloads?