Two concepts of communication as criteria for collective responsibility

Journal of Business Ethics 7 (10):735 - 744 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In part one I review the literature, exposing some of the ambiguities, contradictions, and antinomies involved in the notion of communication. The literature presents us with two rather contradictory notions of communication: one rhetorical, the other responsible. Disparity between the two may be seen to jeopardize a new moral mandate to corporate business. In part two I develop more explicitly the models of rhetorical and responsible communication, locating the issue at the center of a solution to the problem of collective responsibility. A proper exercise of corporate moral responsibility, I argue, is compatible only with a model of responsible communication. I conclude by challenging top management to strive toward a goal of responsible communication at all levels in their respective corporate institutions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
33 (#459,370)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Communications.[author unknown] - 1938 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 45 (2):31-31.
Communications.[author unknown] - 1947 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 52 (2):191-192.
Communications.[author unknown] - 1947 - Dialectica 1 (4):290-290.
Communications.[author unknown] - 1937 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 44 (1):27-28.

Add more references