Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy East and West 55 (2):232-256 (2005)
|Abstract||: Two major philosophers of the twentieth century, the German existential phenomenologist Martin Heidegger and the seminal Japanese Kyoto School philosopher Nishida Kitarō are examined here in an attempt to discern to what extent their ideas may converge. Both are viewed as expressing, each through the lens of his own tradition, a world in transition with the rise of modernity in the West and its subsequent globalization. The popularity of Heidegger's thought among Japanese philosophers, despite its own admitted limitation to the Western "history of being," is connected to Nishida's opening of a uniquely Japanese path in its confrontation with Western philosophy. The focus is primarily on their later works (the post-Kehre Heidegger and the works of Nishida that have been designated "Nishida philosophy"), in which each in his own way attempts to overcome the subject-object dichotomy inherited from the tradition of Western metaphysics by looking to a deeper structure from out of which both subjectivity and objectivity are derived and which embraces both. For Heidegger, the answer lies in being as the opening of unconcealment, from out of which beings emerge, and for Nishida, it is the place of nothingness within which beings are co-determined in their oppositions and relations. Concepts such as Nishida's "discontinuous continuity," "absolutely self-contradictory identity" (between one and many, whole and part, world and things), the mutual interdependence of individuals, and the self-determination of the world through the co-relative self-determination of individuals, and Heidegger's "simultaneity" (zugleich) and "within one another" (ineinander) (of unconcealment and concealment, presencing and absencing), and their "between" (Zwischen) and "jointure" (Fuge) are examined. Through a discussion of these ideas, the suggestion is made of a possible "transition" (Übergang) of both Western and Eastern thinking, in their mutual encounter, both in relation to each other and each in relation to its own past history, leading to both a self-discovery in the other and to a simultaneous self-reconstitution|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nishida Kitarō & John W. M. Krummel (2012). The Unsolved Issue of ConsciousnessThe Unsolved Issue of Consciousness. Philosophy East and West 62 (1).
Rein Raud (2004). 'Place' and 'Being-Time': Spatiotemporal Concepts in the Thought of Nishida Kitaro and Dogen Kigen. Philosophy East and West 54 (1):29-51.
Kitarō Nishida (2012). Place and Dialectic: Two Essays by Kitarō Nishida ; Translated by John W.M. Krummel and Shigenori Nagatomo. Oxford University Press.
Eric Cunningham (2007). Hallucinating the End of History: Nishida, Zen, and the Psychedelic Eschaton. Academica Press.
Curtis A. Rigsby (2009). Nishida on God, Barth and Christianity. Asian Philosophy 19 (2):119 – 157.
Robert E. Carter (2009). God and Nothingness. Philosophy East and West 59 (1):pp. 1-21.
Joel Krueger (2008). Nishida, Agency, and the 'Self-Contradictory' Body. Asian Philosophy 18 (3):213 – 229.
John W. M. Krummel (2011). The Originary Wherein: Heidegger and Nishida on the Sacred and the Religious. Research in Phenomenology 40 (3):378-407.
Curtis A. Rigsby (2010). Nishida on Heidegger. Continental Philosophy Review 42 (4):511-553.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #71,281 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?