David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (3):309-312 (2010)
In this response, I do four things. First, I defend the claim that the action compatibility effect does not distinguish between embodied and traditional accounts of language comprehension. Second, I present neuroimaging and neuropsychological results that seem to support the traditional account. Third, I argue that metaphorical language poses no special challenge to the arguments I gave against embodied theories of comprehension. Fourth, I lay out the architecture of language I advocate and suggest the sorts of data that would decide between traditional and embodied accounts.Keywords: Language; Comprehension; Perception; Action; Embodied cognition; Representation
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Elisabeth Camp (2006). Metaphor in the Mind: The Cognition of Metaphor. Philosophy Compass 1 (2):154-170.
Daniel A. Weiskopf (2007). Concept Empiricism and the Vehicles of Thought. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (s 9-10):156-183.
Nicole L. Wilson & Raymond W. Gibbs (2007). Real and Imagined Body Movement Primes Metaphor Comprehension. Cognitive Science 31 (4):721-731.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Raymond W. Gibbs & Marcus Perlman (2010). Language Understanding is Grounded in Experiential Simulations: A Response to Weiskopf. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (3):305-308.
Robert W. Batterman (2010). Reduction and Renormalization. In Gerhard Ernst & Andreas Hüttemann (eds.), Time, Chance and Reduction: Philosophical Aspects of Statistical Mechanics. Cambridge University Press 159--179.
Michael Schwartz (2009). Gibbs and the Problems of Satisfaction and Well-Being. Business Ethics 18 (4):408-411.
Esther-Mirjam Sent (2001). Sent Simulating Simon Simulating Scientists. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (3):479-500.
Paul Gibbs (2009). Response to 'Gibbs and the Problems of Satisfaction and Well-Being'. Business Ethics 18 (4):412-413.
Daniel A. Weiskopf (2008). Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading - by Alvin I. Goldman. Philosophical Books 49 (2):168-170.
Raymond W. Gibbs Jr (2006). Metaphor Interpretation as Embodied Simulation. Mind and Language 21 (3):434–458.
David B. Malament & Sandy L. Zabell (1980). Why Gibbs Phase Averages Work--The Role of Ergodic Theory. Philosophy of Science 47 (3):339-349.
Brendan Balcerak Jackson (2009). Understanding and Semantic Structure: Reply to Timothy Williamson. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt3):337-343.
Sent E.-M. (2001). Sent Simulating Simon Simulating Scientists. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (3):479-500.
J. David Velleman (2007). Reply to Catriona MacKenzie. Philosophical Explorations 10 (3):283 – 290.
S. Perlman (1964). The Causes and the Outbreak of the Corinthian War. Classical Quarterly 14 (01):64-.
Robert Rosen (1964). The Gibbs' Paradox and the Distinguishability of Physical Systems. Philosophy of Science 31 (3):232-236.
Mark Perlman (2004). The Modern Philosophical Resurrection of Teleology. The Monist 87 (1):3-51.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads26 ( #149,997 of 1,907,527 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,819 of 1,907,527 )
How can I increase my downloads?