David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (3):309-312 (2010)
In this response, I do four things. First, I defend the claim that the action compatibility effect does not distinguish between embodied and traditional accounts of language comprehension. Second, I present neuroimaging and neuropsychological results that seem to support the traditional account. Third, I argue that metaphorical language poses no special challenge to the arguments I gave against embodied theories of comprehension. Fourth, I lay out the architecture of language I advocate and suggest the sorts of data that would decide between traditional and embodied accounts.Keywords: Language; Comprehension; Perception; Action; Embodied cognition; Representation
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Nicole L. Wilson & Raymond W. Gibbs (2007). Real and Imagined Body Movement Primes Metaphor Comprehension. Cognitive Science 31 (4):721-731.
Daniel A. Weiskopf (2007). Concept Empiricism and the Vehicles of Thought. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (s 9-10):156-183.
Elisabeth Camp (2006). Metaphor in the Mind: The Cognition of Metaphor. Philosophy Compass 1 (2):154-170.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Raymond W. Gibbs & Marcus Perlman (2010). Language Understanding is Grounded in Experiential Simulations: A Response to Weiskopf. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (3):305-308.
Robert W. Batterman (2010). Reduction and Renormalization. In Gerhard Ernst & Andreas Hüttemann (eds.), Time, Chance and Reduction: Philosophical Aspects of Statistical Mechanics. Cambridge University Press 159--179.
Michael Schwartz (2009). Gibbs and the Problems of Satisfaction and Well-Being. Business Ethics 18 (4):408-411.
Esther-Mirjam Sent (2001). Sent Simulating Simon Simulating Scientists. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (3):479-500.
Paul Gibbs (2009). Response to 'Gibbs and the Problems of Satisfaction and Well-Being'. Business Ethics 18 (4):412-413.
Daniel A. Weiskopf (2008). Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading - by Alvin I. Goldman. Philosophical Books 49 (2):168-170.
Raymond W. Gibbs Jr (2006). Metaphor Interpretation as Embodied Simulation. Mind and Language 21 (3):434–458.
David B. Malament & Sandy L. Zabell (1980). Why Gibbs Phase Averages Work--The Role of Ergodic Theory. Philosophy of Science 47 (3):339-349.
Brendan Balcerak Jackson (2009). Understanding and Semantic Structure: Reply to Timothy Williamson. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt3):337-343.
Sent E.-M. (2001). Sent Simulating Simon Simulating Scientists. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (3):479-500.
J. David Velleman (2007). Reply to Catriona MacKenzie. Philosophical Explorations 10 (3):283 – 290.
S. Perlman (1964). The Causes and the Outbreak of the Corinthian War. Classical Quarterly 14 (01):64-.
Robert Rosen (1964). The Gibbs' Paradox and the Distinguishability of Physical Systems. Philosophy of Science 31 (3):232-236.
Mark Perlman (2004). The Modern Philosophical Resurrection of Teleology. The Monist 87 (1):3-51.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads33 ( #144,146 of 1,902,530 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #131,463 of 1,902,530 )
How can I increase my downloads?