Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Quarterly 39 (157):409-424 (1989)
|Abstract||Individual people are morally responsible. But can groups of people - corporations and nations, for example - be morally responsible as well? An affirmative answer has been defended by appealing to two criteria, here identified as the turnover test and the distribution test. The article argues for a Scotch verdict: neither criterion proves the point.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jan Edward Garrett (1989). Unredistributable Corporate Moral Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 8 (7):535 - 545.
Stephen Wilmot (2001). Corporate Moral Responsibility: What Can We Infer From Our Understanding of Organisations? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 30 (2):161 - 169.
Thomas L. Carson (1994). Corporate Moral Agency: A Case From Literature. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (2):155 - 156.
John R. Welch (1992). Responsabilidad Colectiva y Reduccionismo. Pensamiento 48:49–68.
Björn Petersson (2008). Collective Omissions and Responsibility. Philosophical Papers 37 (2):243-261.
Geoff Moore (1999). Corporate Moral Agency: Review and Implications. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 21 (4):329 - 343.
Rita C. Manning (1984). Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Personhood. Journal of Business Ethics 3 (1):77 - 84.
C. Soares (2003). Corporate Versus Individual Moral Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 46 (2):143 - 150.
John D. Bishop (1991). The Moral Responsibility of Corporate Executives for Disasters. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (5):377 - 383.
Jeffrey Nesteruk (2007). Corporate Speech as Commercial Speech. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (1):97-103.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #246,694 of 739,461 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?