David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Symposium 13 (2):25-54 (2009)
Badiou claims Deleuze’s thinking is pre-critical metaphysics that can-not be understood in relation to Kant. I argue that Deleuze is indeed a metaphysical thinker, but precisely because he is a kind of Kantian. Badiou is right that Deleuze rejects the overwhelmingly epistemic problems of critical thought in its canonical sense, but he is wrong to claim that Deleuze completely rejects Kant. Instead, Deleuze is interested in developing a metaphysics that prolongs Kant’s conception of a productive synthesis irreducible to empirical causation. Where Badiou’s criticism might hold, however, is in the risk that Deleuze’s strategy runs of contaminating his new metaphysics with a new kind of transcendental idealism. This reading has recently been developed by Ray Brassier and I explore and evaluate it, concluding that in Difference and Repetition this accusation may be correct, but that by the time of Anti-Oedipus, Deleuze (now with Guattari) has the intellectual re-sources to resist it
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jeffrey Bell (2006). Charting the Road of Inquiry: Deleuze's Humean Pragmatics and the Challenge of Badiou. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (3):399-425.
Jeffrey Bell (2011). Between Realism and Anti-Realism: Deleuze and the Spinozist Tradition in Philosophy. Deleuze Studies 5 (1):1-17.
Levi R. Bryant (2008). Difference and Givenness: Deleuze's Transcendental Empiricism and the Ontology of Immanence. Northwestern University Press.
Daniel W. Smith & Henry Somers-Hall (eds.) (2012). The Cambridge Companion to Deleuze. Cambridge University Press.
Jack Reynolds (2008). Transcendental Priority and Deleuzian Normativity. Deleuze Studies 3 (1):15.
James Williams (2009). If Not Here, Then Where? On the Location and Individuation of Events in Badiou and Deleuze. Deleuze Studies 3 (1):97-123.
Daniel W. Smith (2010). Genesis and Difference: Deleuze, Maimon, and the Post-Kantian Reading of Leibniz. In Sjoerd van Tuinen & Niamh McDonnell (eds.), Deleuze and the Fold: A Critical Reader. Palgrave Macmillan.
Diane J. Beddoes, Breeding Demons: A Critical Enquiry Into the Relationship Between Kant and Deleuze with Specific References to Women.
Jack Reynolds (2008). Transcendental Priority and Deleuzian Normativity. A Reply to James Williams. Deleuze Studies 2 (1):101-108.
Nathan Widder (2001). The Rights of Simulacra: Deleuze and the Univocity of Being. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 34 (4):437-453.
Taylor Hammer (2007). The Role of Ontology in the Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (1):57-77.
Simon Choat (2009). Deleuze, Marx and the Politicisation of Philosophy. Deleuze Studies 3 (suppl):8-27.
Kane X. Faucher (2010). Critical Forces: True Critique or Mere Criticism of Deleuze Contra Hegel? Deleuze Studies 4 (3):329-355.
John Protevi (2010). An Approach to Difference and Repetition. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 5 (11):35-43.
Stamatia Portanova (2009). Act III A Digital Deleuze : Performance and New Media. Like a Prosthesis : Critical Performance à Digital Deleuze / Timothy Murray ; Performance as the Distribution of Life : From Aeschylus to Chekhov to VJing Via Deleuze and Guattari / Andrew Murphie ; The 'Minor' Arithmetic of Rhythm : Imagining Digital Technologies for Dance. In Laura Cull (ed.), Deleuze and Performance. Edinburgh University Press.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads6 ( #160,010 of 1,004,658 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,123 of 1,004,658 )
How can I increase my downloads?