Is ecosabotage civil disobedience?

Philosophy and Geography 4 (1):97 – 107 (2001)
According to current definitions of civil disobedience, drawn from the work of John Rawls and Carl Cohen, eco-saboteurs are not civil disobedients because their disobedience is not a form of address and/or does not appeal to the public's sense of justice or human welfare. But this definition also excludes disobedience by a wide range of groups, from labor activists to hunt saboteurs, either because they are obstructionist or because they address moral concerns other than justice or the public weal. However earlier definitions of civil disobedience were not so narrow. I review the development of the current definition and the circumstances of its acceptance. I argue that the circumstances which help to explain the attractiveness of the Rawls/Cohen formulations in the 1970s are no longer applicable and that the question of civil disobedience should be revisited. I suggest a wider definition according to which at least some types of eco-sabotage would be civil disobedience.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/10903770124815
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,651
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Hugo A. Bedau (1961). On Civil Disobedience. Journal of Philosophy 58 (21):653-665.
Alan Carter (1998). In Defence of Radical Disobedience. Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (1):29–47.
David Wieck (1970). Dissidence. The Monist 54 (4):587-601.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Adele Santana (2012). Three Elements of Stakeholder Legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):257-265.
Patti Tamara Lenard (2010). What's Unique About Immigrant Protest? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (3):315 - 332.
Patti Tamara Lenard (2010). What’s Unique About Immigrant Protest? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (3):315-332.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

64 ( #75,235 of 1,902,769 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #144,693 of 1,902,769 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.