Graduate studies at Western
Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):67 - 81 (1995)
|Abstract||Some have argued that Locke's failure to condemn contemporary slavery is best viewed as a personal moral lapse which does not reflect on his political theory. I argue to the contrary|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Terrance McConnell (1984). The Nature and Basis of Inalienable Rights. Law and Philosophy 3 (1):25 - 59.
David Ellerman (2010). Inalienable Rights: A Litmus Test for Liberal Theories of Justice. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 29 (Sept.):571-599.
Eric Chwang (2008). Against the Inalienable Right to Withdraw From Research. Bioethics 22 (7):370-378.
A. John Simmons (1983). Inalienable Rights and Locke's Treatises. Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (3):175-204.
Derrick Darby (2009). Rights, Race, and Recognition. Cambridge University Press.
Ari Helo & Peter Onuf (2003). Jefferson, Morality, and the Problem of Slavery. The William and Mary Quarterly, Third Series 60 (3):583-614.
Peter Vallentyne (2001). Self-Ownership. In Laurence Becker & Charlotte Becker (eds.), Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd edition. Garland Publishing.
Jane Duran (2010). Slavery in Global Context. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):61-69.
A. John Simmons (1998). Makers' Rights. Journal of Ethics 2 (3):197-218.
David Ellerman (1999). The Democratic Firm: An Argument Based on Ordinary Jurisprudence. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 21 (2-3):111 - 124.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads12 ( #101,180 of 722,947 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,947 )
How can I increase my downloads?