Repeated judgments in elicitation tasks: efficacy of the MOLE method

In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does the Method of Cases Rest on a Mistake?Moti Mizrahi - 2014 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 5 (2):183-197.
What is the mole?Peter G. Nelson - 2013 - Foundations of Chemistry 15 (1):3-11.
Sequential effects in two- and four-choice tasks.Shirley C. Peeke & George C. Stone - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 92 (1):111.
The Butterfly, the Mole and the Sage.Robert Elliot Allinson - 2009 - Asian Philosophy 19 (3):213-223.
A qualitative analysis of the lottery equivalents method.Adam Oliver - 2007 - Economics and Philosophy 23 (2):185-204.
Judgments of recency and list position for repeated events.We Hockley & R. Costa - 1989 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27 (6):512-512.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
19 (#775,535)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations