David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 26 (6):839 - 862 (2013)
An argument is developed for the conclusion that certain neurological conditions and disorders are directly relevant for understanding the self?'s embodiment and the ownership of conscious experience enjoyed by such an embodied self. Since these neurological conditions and disorders provide evidence that there can be shifts of, and compromises to, ownership, they help identify neural substrates and realizers of such ownership. However, even if recent neuroimaging and neuropsychological nominees for neural substrates of ownership unity are core realizers of ownership, they are not its total realizers. Implications of the distinction between core and total realizers are discussed
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Alva Noë (2005). Action in Perception. The MIT Press.
Anthony Chemero (2011). Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. A Bradford Book.
Andy Clark (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford University Press.
Dan Zahavi (2005). Subjectivity and Selfhood: Investigating the First-Person Perspective. Cambridge MA: Bradford Book/MIT Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Lukasz A. Kurowski (forthcoming). Ownership Unity, Neural Substrates, and Philosophical Relevance: A Response to Rex Welshon's “Searching for the Neural Realizers of Ownership Unity. Philosophical Psychology:1-10.
Rex Welshon (forthcoming). Reply to Lukasz Kurowski's “Ownership Unity, Neural Substrates, and Philosophical Relevance. Philosophical Psychology:1-5.
Similar books and articles
Tristan Rogers (2010). Self-Ownership, World-Ownership, and Initial Acquisition. Libertarian Papers 2.
Per Bylund (2012). Man and Matter: How the Former Gains Ownership of the Latter. Libertarian Papers 4.
Meir Dan-Cohen (2001). The Value of Ownership. Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (4):404–434.
Lea Ypi (2011). Self-Ownership and the State: A Democratic Critique. Ratio 24 (1):91-106.
Brian McElwee (2010). The Appeal of Self-Ownership. Social Theory and Practice 36 (2):213-232.
George G. Brenkert (1998). Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Autonomy. Journal of Ethics 2 (1):27-55.
Alex Shaw, Vivian Li & Kristina R. Olson (2012). Children Apply Principles of Physical Ownership to Ideas. Cognitive Science 36 (8):1383-1403.
Robert S. Taylor (2004). A Kantian Defense of Self-Ownership. Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (1):65-78.
Daniel Moseley (2011). A Lockean Argument for Basic Income. Basic Income Studies 6 (2):11.
Edward Feser (2005). Personal Identity and Self-Ownership. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (2):100-125.
Thierry Poulain-Rehm & Xavier Lepers (2013). Does Employee Ownership Benefit Value Creation? The Case of France (2001–2005). Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2):325-340.
Akira Inoue (2007). Can a Right of Self-Ownership Be Robust? Law and Philosophy 26 (6):575 - 587.
Allan Gibbard (2011). Narveson on Liberty and Equality. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):249-258.
Eric Mack (2002). Self-Ownership, Marxism, and Egalitarianism: Part II: Challenges to the Self-Ownership Thesis. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (2):237-276.
Alessandro Zattoni (2011). Who Should Control a Corporation? Toward a Contingency Stakeholder Model for Allocating Ownership Rights. Journal of Business Ethics 103 (2):255-274.
Added to index2012-08-31
Total downloads21 ( #134,938 of 1,725,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #211,008 of 1,725,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?