David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):3 – 8 (2009)
In standard medical care, physicians select treatments for patients based on clinical judgment, considering which treatment is best for the individual patient, given the patient's history and circumstances. In contrast, investigators conducting randomized clinical trials select treatments for participants based on a random selection process. Because this process represents a significant departure from the norms of standard medical care, it is widely assumed that potential research participants must understand randomization to give valid informed consent. This assumption, together with data that many research participants do not understand randomization, implies that randomized clinical trials often fail to obtain adequately informed consent. Before accepting this conclusion, and before initiating extensive efforts to improve research participants' understanding of randomization, we should assess the plausible, but rarely analyzed assumption that participants need to understand randomization to give valid informed consent for randomized clinical trials.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Piotr S. Iwanowski (2007). Informed Consent Procedure for Clinical Trials in Emergency Settings: The Polish Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):333-336.
Franklin G. Miller & Steven Joffe (2006). Evaluating the Therapeutic Misconception. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (4):353-366.
Robert M. Veatch (2007). The Irrelevance of Equipoise. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (2):167 – 183.
Don Marquis (1986). An Argument That All Prerandomized Clinical Trials Are Unethical. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (4):367-383.
Eric R. Pedersen, Clayton Neighbors, Judy Tidwell & Ty W. Lostutter (2011). Do Undergraduate Student Research Participants Read Psychological Research Consent Forms? Examining Memory Effects, Condition Effects, and Individual Differences. Ethics and Behavior 21 (4):332 - 350.
Susan S. Khalil, Henry J. Silverman, May Raafat, Samer El-Kamary & Maged El-Setouhy (2007). Attitudes, Understanding, and Concerns Regarding Medical Research Amongst Egyptians: A Qualitative Pilot Study. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 8 (1):9.
Leslie Cannold (1997). "There Is No Evidence to Suggest...": Changing the Way We Judge Information for Disclosure in the Informed Consent Process. Hypatia 12 (2):165 - 184.
Jeremy Howick (2009). If Children Understand Drawing Straws and Flipping Coins, Research Participants Can Understand Randomization. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):19 – 20.
David Wendler (2009). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Must Research Participants Understand Randomization?”. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):W1 – W2.
Added to index2009-02-01
Total downloads9 ( #126,642 of 1,008,294 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?