|Abstract||Leif Wenar, in “The Nature of Rights,” claims to have provided an analytical framework which is not only adequate for explicating all assertions of rights but whose deployment offers a way out of the deadlock he believes to exist between will theories and interest theories regarding the nature of rights.i To have accomplished one, let alone both, of these things would be a significant achievement in the field of rights theory. It is therefore worth showing why, unfortunately, he has not succeeded on either score. Despite the clarity of Wenar’s exposition of his own position, and notwithstanding the incisive insights he brings to bear in the course of it, his revised Hohfeldian analytical framework does not in fact serve better than the original to clarify what is at stake in controversies over rights, and his deployment of it does not provide a cogent alternative to the interest theory|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Thom Brooks (2008). A Two-Tiered Reparations Theory: A Reply to Wenar. Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (4):666-669.
Leif Wenar (2008). Human Rights and Equality in the Work of David Miller. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (4):401-411.
L. Wenar (1998). Original Acquisition of Private Property. Mind 107 (428):799-820.
Leif Wenar (2008). The Analysis of Rights. In Matthew H. Kramer (ed.), The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Leif Wenar (2003). Epistemic Rights and Legal Rights. Analysis 63 (2):142–146.
Leif Wenar, Rights. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Leif Wenar (2005). The Nature of Rights. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (3):223–252.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads78 ( #10,165 of 549,113 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,113 )
How can I increase my downloads?