Response to open Peer commentaries on “must research participants understand randomization?”
American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):W1 – W2 (2009)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJason Scott Robert, Mary Sunderland, Rachel Ankeny & Jane Maienschein (2008). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Ethos and Ethics of Translational Research”. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):1-3.
Sandra Soo-Jin Lee & LaVera Crawley (2009). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Research 2.0: Social Networking and Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomics”. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6):1-3.
Mildred Cho, Sara Tobin, Henry Greely, Jennifer McCormick, Angie Boyce & David Magnus (2008). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Strangers at the Beachside: Research Ethics Consultation”. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):4-6.
Jeremy Howick (2009). If Children Understand Drawing Straws and Flipping Coins, Research Participants Can Understand Randomization. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):19 – 20.
David Wendler & Christine Grady (2008). What Should Research Participants Understand to Understand They Are Participants in Research? Bioethics 22 (4):203–208.
Inmaculada de Melo-Martin (2008). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Duty to Participate in Research: Does Social Context Matter?”. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):3-4.
Autumn Fiester (2008). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Justifying a Presumption of Restraint in Animal Biotechnology Research”. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):W1 – W2.
Angela Ballantyne (2010). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “How to Do Research Fairly in an Unjust World”. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):4-6.
Vardit Ravitsky & Benjamin Wilfond (2006). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants”: Defining Clinical Utility And Revisiting the Role of Relationships. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):W10-W12.
David Wendler (2009). Must Research Participants Understand Randomization? American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):3 – 8.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-02-01Total downloads1 ( #274,507 of 548,977 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
