David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):1 – 7 (2003)
The U.S. federal regulations require investigators conducting nonbeneficial research to obtain the assent of children who are capable of providing it. Unfortunately, there has been no analysis of which children are capable of assent or even what abilities ground the capacity to give assent. Why should investigators be required to obtain the positive agreement of some children, but not others, before enrolling them in research that does not offer a compensating potential for direct benefit? We argue that the scope of children's research decision making should be based on the principles of respect for autonomy and nonmaleficence. These principles imply that the threshold for assent should be fixed at 14 years of age, and a dissent requirement should be adopted for all children in the context of nonbeneficial research.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jennifer Baker (2013). Children's Agency, Interests, and Medical Consent. HEC Forum 25 (4):311-324.
Victoria A. Miller, Dennis Drotar & Eric Kodish (2004). Children's Competence for Assent and Consent: A Review of Empirical Findings. [REVIEW] Ethics and Behavior 14 (3):255 – 295.
Donna Coch (2007). Neuroimaging Research with Children: Ethical Issues and Case Scenarios. Journal of Moral Education 36 (1):1-18.
Erin Talati Paquette, Julie Najita, Debra Morley & Steven Joffe (2015). Child and Parent Understanding of Clinical Trials: The Semi-Structured Comprehension Interview. Ajob Empirical Bioethics 6 (2):23-32.
Similar books and articles
David Wendler (2005). Protecting Subjects Who Cannot Give Consent: Toward a Better Standard for "Minimal" Risks. Hastings Center Report 35 (5):37-43.
Lillian M. Range & C. Randy Cotton (1995). Assent and Permission Rejoinder. Ethics and Behavior 5 (4):345 – 347.
Robert M. Nelson & William W. Reynolds (2003). We Should Reject Passive Resignation in Favor of Requiring the Assent of Younger Children for Participation in Nonbeneficial Research. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):11 – 13.
Terrence F. Ackerman (1980). Moral Duties of Parents and Nontherapeutic Clinical Research Procedures Involving Children. Bioethics Quarterly 2 (2):94-111.
Cheryl M. Sterling & Gary A. Walco (2003). Protection of Children's Rights to Self-Determination in Research. Ethics and Behavior 13 (3):237 – 247.
Ritva Halila & Salla Lötjönen (2003). Why Shouldn't Children Decide Whether They Are Enrolled in Nonbeneficial Medical Research? American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):35-36.
Lillian M. Range & C. Randy Cotton (1995). Reports of Assent and Permission in Research with Children: Illustrations and Suggestions. Ethics and Behavior 5 (1):49 – 66.
Antal E. Solyom (2004). Omitted Considerations and Populations: A Response to "Should Children Decide Whether They Are Enrolled in Nonbeneficial Research?" by David Wendler and Seema Shah (AJOB 3:4). [REVIEW] American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):39-40.
Howard Trachtman (2003). From the Mouths of Babes: A Response to "Should Children Decide Whether They Are Enrolled in Nonbeneficial Research?" by David Wendler and Seema Shah. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):35-35.
David Wendler & Seema Shah (2003). A Response to Commentators on "Should Children Decide Whether They Are Enrolled in Nonbeneficial Research?". American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):37-38.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #312,911 of 1,907,534 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,516 of 1,907,534 )
How can I increase my downloads?