Sequential modulation of distractor-interference produced by semantic generalization of stimulus features

, &
Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01271

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Sequential Modulation of Cue Use in the Task Switching Paradigm.Mike Wendt, Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez, Renate Reisenauer, Thomas Jacobsen & Gesine Dreisbach - 2012 - Frontiers in Psychology 3.
Semantic generalization with experimentally induced associations.Wendell E. Jeffrey & Richard J. Kaplan - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 54 (5):336.
The semantic differential and mediated generalization as measures of meaning.Leonard Lipton & Richard L. Blanton - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 54 (6):431.
Stimulus generalization of a positive conditioned reinforcer: IV. Concurrent generalization of reinforcing and discriminative stimulus functions following fixed-interval training.David R. Thomas & Donald V. Derosa - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (2):260.
Role of stimulus labeling in stimulus generalization.David R. Thomas & Alberta Decapito - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (6):913.
Degraded stimulus visibility and the effects of perceptual load on distractor interference.Yaffa Yeshurun & Hadas Marciano - 2013 - Frontiers in Psychology 4.
Stimulus generalization as a function of the number and range of generalization test stimuli.David R. Thomas & George Bistey - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (6):599.
Exceptional distractor stimuli: interference by famous distractor faces.Nilli Lavie - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (2):75-82.
Effect of test stimulus range on stimulus generalization in human subjects.Gary Hansen, Arthur Tomie, David R. Thomas & Doris H. Thomas - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (4):634.
Generalization: I. Generalization gradients from single and multiple stimulus points. II. Generalization of inhibition.Harry I. Kalish & Audrey Haber - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (2):176.
A high-loaded hemisphere successfully ignores distractors.Ritsuko Nishimura & Kazuhito Yoshizaki - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):953-961.
Interference produced by phonetic similarities: Stimulus recognition, associative retrieval, or both?Douglas L. Nelson & Richard C. Borden - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (2):167.
Effects of interdimensional training on stimulus generalization: An extension.David R. Thomas & Kimbal L. Wheatley - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (6):1080.
Do action goals change distractor interference? Evidence for top-down modulation of visual attention in action space during action execution.Colman Hayley, Remington Roger & Kritikos Ada - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
Comparison of stimulus generalization following variable-ratio and variable-interval training.David R. Thomas & Richard W. Switalski - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (2):236.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
12 (#1,058,801)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The mental representation of parity and number magnitude.Stanislas Dehaene, Serge Bossini & Pascal Giraux - 1993 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122 (3):371.
Cognitive control acts locally.Wim Notebaert & Tom Verguts - 2008 - Cognition 106 (2):1071-1080.

View all 7 references / Add more references