Deterministic versus indeterministic descriptions: Not that different after all?
| Abstract | The guiding question of this paper is: how similar are deterministic descriptions and indeterministic descriptions from a predictive viewpoint? The deterministic and indeterministic descriptions of concern in this paper are measure-theoretic deterministic systems and stochastic processes, respectively. I will explain intuitively some mathematical results which show that measure-theoretic deterministic systems and stochastic processes give more often the same predictions than one might perhaps have expected, and hence that from a predictive viewpoint these descriptions are quite similar. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Daniel Steel (2005). Indeterminism and the Causal Markov Condition. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (1):3-26.
Mark W. Brown (2008). The Place of Description in Phenomenology's Naturalization. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (4).
Klaus Jürgen Düsberg (1995). Deterministisches Chaos: Einige Wissenschaftstheoretisch Interessante Aspekte. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 26 (1):11 - 24.
Charlotte Werndl (2011). On the Observational Equivalence of Continuous-Time Deterministic and Indeterministic Descriptions. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1 (2):193-225.
Charlotte Werndl (2009). Are Deterministic Descriptions and Indeterministic Descriptions Observationally Equivalent? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 40 (3):232-242.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-07-28Total downloads9 ( #113,901 of 548,970 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,970 )How can I increase my downloads? |

