Freedom, morality, plea bargaining, and the supreme court
Philosophy and Public Affairs 8 (3):203-234 (1979)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTheodore W. Ruger (2004). The United State Supreme Court and Health Law: The Year in Review: The Supreme Court Federalizes Managed Care Liability. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (3):528-531.
Dan López de Sa (2007). The Chief Supreme Court Justice: A Metaphysical Puzzle? (El Presidente Del Tribunal Supremo: ¿Un Problema Metafísico?). Crítica 39 (115):61 - 68.
Gabriel Uzquiano (2004). The Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Justices: A Metaphysical Puzzle. Noûs 38 (1):135–153.
Roger Berkowitz, Revolutionary Constitutionalism: Some Thoughts on Laurie Ackermann's Jurisprudence.
Michael Gorr (2000). The Morality of Plea Bargaining. Social Theory and Practice 26 (1):129-151.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads10 ( #106,175 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
