Reconnoitering Combatant Moral Equality

Journal of Military Ethics 6 (1):60-74 (2007)
Contra Michael Walzer and Jeff McMahan, neither classical just war theory nor the contemporary rules of war require or support any notion of combatant moral equality. Nations rightly accept prohibitions against punishing enemy combatants without recognizing any legal or moral right of aggressors to kill. The notion of combatant moral equality has real import only in our interpersonal -- and intrapersonal -- attitudes, since the notion effectively preempts any ground for conscientious objection. Walzer is criticized for over-emphasizing our collective responses to war conduct and slighting our personal, extra-political responses.
Keywords moral equality of combatants (soldiers)  just war theory  conscientious objection  rules of war  Michael Walzer
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/15027570601183352
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Roger Wertheimer, Reconnoitering Combatant Moral Equality
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
M. Walzer (1979). Just and Unjust Wars. Philosophy 54 (209):415-420.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

530 ( #647 of 1,724,750 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

87 ( #9,455 of 1,724,750 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.