A new way with the consequence argument, and the fixity of the laws
Analysis 63 (3):208-212 (2003)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Consequence Determinism Fixity Laws Metaphysics Van Inwagen, P | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesLynne Rudder Baker (2008). The Irrelevance of the Consequence Argument. Analysis 68 (297):13–22.
Alex Blum (2003). The Core of the Consequence Argument. Dialectica 57 (4):423-429.
Tomis Kapitan (1991). Ability and Cognition: A Defense of Compatibilism. Philosophical Studies 63 (August):231-43.
Stephen Hetherington (2006). So-Far Incompatibilism and the so-Far Consequence Argument. Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):163-178.
Christopher S. Hill (1992). Van Inwagen on the Consequence Argument. Analysis 52 (2):49-55.
Dana K. Nelkin (2001). The Consequence Argument and the "Mind" Argument. Analysis 61 (2):107-115.
Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield (2000). The Irrelevance of Indeterministic Counterexamples to Principle Beta. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):173-185.
Michael Huemer (2000). Van Inwagen's Consequence Argument. Philosophical Review 109 (4):525-544.
Tomis Kapitan (1996). Modal Principles in the Metaphysics of Free Will. Philosophical Perspectives 10:419-45.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads23 ( #53,914 of 549,196 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,196 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
