David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 103 (1):43 - 86 (1995)
In 1792 and 1798 Kant noticed two basic problems with hisMetaphysical Foundations of Natural Science (MAdN) which opened a crucial gap in the Critical system as a whole. Why is theMAdN so important? I show that the Analogies of Experience form an integrated proof of transeunt causality. This is central to Kant's answer to Hume. This proof requires explicating the empirical concept of matter as the moveable in space, it requires the specifically metaphysical principle that every physical event has an external cause, and it requires a metaphysical principle regarding the individuation of spatio-temporal things. These three doctrines are not defended in the firstCritique, but only in theMAdN. Kant's transcendental analysis of the conditions of experience thus requires the special metaphysics of theMAdN. This marks an important shift in Kant's view of the metaphysical basis of the transcendental philosophy.
|Keywords||Michael Friedman causal judgment hylozoism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Michael Friedman (1992). Kant and the Exact Sciences. Harvard University Press.
Immanuel Kant (1790). Critique of Judgment. Barnes & Noble Books.
David Hume (1777). Enquiries Concerning the Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. Greenwood Press.
Paul Guyer (1987). Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
Norman Kemp Smith (2003). A Commentary to Kant's 'Critique of Pure Reason'. Palgrave Macmillan.
Citations of this work BETA
Kenneth R. Westphal (2011). Comments on Graham Bird’s The Revolutionary Kant. Kantian Review 16 (2):1-11.
Similar books and articles
Lara Ostaric (2009). Kant's Account of Nature's Systematicity and the Unity of Theoretical and Practical Reason. Inquiry 52 (2):155 – 178.
Robert Hanna (2011). Kant's Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects, and The Gap in the B Deduction. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):399 - 415.
Gary Hatfield (ed.) (2004). Immanuel Kant: Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science: With Selections From the Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
Sean Walsh (2007). Incongruent Counterparts and Causality. Kant-Studien 98 (4):418-430.
Colin Marshall (2010). Kant's Metaphysics of the Self. Philosophers' Imprint 10 (8):1-21.
Immanuel Kant (2004). Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Cambridge University Press.
Steffen Ducheyne (2011). Kant and Whewell on Bridging Principles Between Metaphysics and Science. Kant-Studien 102 (1):22-45.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1995). Kant's Dynamic Constructions. Journal of Philosophical Research 20:381-429.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2004). Kant's Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #99,742 of 1,938,542 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #54,750 of 1,938,542 )
How can I increase my downloads?