‘Hegel, Formalism, and Robert Turner’s Ceramic Art’.
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Jahrbuch für Hegelforschung 3:259–283 (1997)
Hegel’s aesthetic ideal is the perfect integration of form and content within a work of art. This ideal is incompatible with the predominant 20th-century principle of formalist criticism, that form is the sole important factor in a work of art. Although the formalist dichotomy between form and content has been criticized on philosophical grounds, that does not suffice to justify Hegel’s ideal. Justifying Hegel’s ideal requires detailed art criticism that shows how form and content are, and why they should be, integrated in good works of art. This essay provides some of this criticism. By focusing on the work of the contemporary artist, Robert Turner, this criticism further suggests that Hegel’s aesthetic ideal is still relevant. Moreover, the nature of Turner’s work suggests that art is still relevant in our day in ways Hegel did not expect.
|Keywords||Aesthetic formalism Aesthetic form and content Robert Turner ceramics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ido Geiger (2005). Is Art a Thing of the Past? Idealistic Studies 35 (2-3):173-195.
Khosrow Bagheri Noaparast & Mohammad Zoheir Bagheri Noaparast (2011). Aesthetic Formalism, Reactions and Solutions. Wisdom and Philosophy 6 (4):101-112.
Daniel J. Goodey (1999). The Spirit of Art. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 6 (1):39-47.
Barbara Montero (2012). Practice Makes Perfect: The Effect of Dance Training on the Aesthetic Judge. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11 (1):59-68.
Daniel A. Siedell (2011). Art in and Out of Context. Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (1):118-122.
Nick Zangwill (2000). Defusing Anti-Formalist Arguments. British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (3):376-383.
Nick Zangwill (2000). In Defence of Moderate Aesthetic Formalism. Philosophical Quarterly 50 (201):476-493.
Katherine Thomson (2002). Aesthetic and Ethical Mediocrity in Art. Philosophical Papers 31 (2):199-215.
Nick Zangwill (1999). Feasible Aesthetic Formalism. Noûs 33 (4):610-629.
David E. W. Fenner (2008). Formalism and the Consumable Arts. Journal of Philosophical Research 33:127-141.
Nick Zangwill (2002). Are There Counterexamples to Aesthetic Theories of Art? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):111–118.
Arnold Isenberg (1973). Aesthetics and the Theory of Criticism. Chicago,University of Chicago Press.
Robert Pippin (2007). What Was Abstract Art? (From the Point of View of Hegel). In Stephen Houlgate (ed.), Hegel and the Arts. Northwestern University Press. 1-24.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-03-25
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?