Graduate studies at Western
International Philosophical Quarterly 33 (3):263-272 (1993)
|Abstract||In Hegel’s Idealism, Robert Pippin contends that Hegel develops a more adequate version of Fichte’s idealism, where the key to idealism lies in the general thesis that there are conditions presupposed by self-conscious judgments about objects. Focusing on this thesis led post-Kantian German idealists to dismiss Kant’s doctrine that space and time are a priori forms of intuition and to develop views of the autonomy of human reason in terms of thought’s self-determination. While Pippin and I agree on some fundamentals, we disagree diametrically about the nature of Hegel’s idealism. Four of my main objections are these. (1) The thesis that there are conditions for self-conscious judgments about objects only entails idealism given certain kinds of conditions (such as Kant’s doctrines about space and time). (2) Hegel expressly denies that ‘the autonomy of thought’ primarily concerns the autonomy of human thinking. (3) Pippin’s interpretation of Hegel’s chapter on ‘Force and Understanding’, which is decisive for his interpretation of Hegel’s idealism, is not borne out by the examples Hegel uses to illustrate and defend his view. (4) Hegel’s frequent use in his Logics of categories that plainly derive from contingent features of our world is not, as Pippin would have it, an ironic concession that marks the reductio ad absurdum of Hegel’s view. On the contrary, such categories and their empirical basis is central to Hegel’s idealism, which is deeply naturalistic and expressly based in the empirical sciences. (1,000 word abstract in: Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 65.6 (1992):64–65.)|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert B. Pippin (1989). Hegel's Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Tom Rockmore (2004). Hegel, Idealism, and Analytic Philosophy. Yale University Press.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1996). ‘Kant, Hegel, and the Transcendental Material Conditions of Possible Experience’. Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 33:23-41.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2006). Hegel and Realism. In John R. Shook & Joseph Margolis (eds.), A Companion to Pragmatism. Blackwell Pub..
Howard Ponzer (2008). Reconciliation in Hegel's Speculative Idealism. Epoché 13 (1):49-66.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2009). ‘Does Kant’s Opus Postumum Anticipate Hegel’s Absolute Idealism?’. In E.-O. Onnasch (ed.), Kants Philosophie der Natur. Ihre Entwicklung bis zum Opus postumum und Nachwirkung. deGruyter.
Robert B. Pippin (1991). Idealism and Agency in Kant and Hegel. Journal of Philosophy 88 (10):532-541.
Tom Rockmore (2007). On Reading Hegel. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (1):55-66.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2007). Intelligenz and the Interpretation of Hegel's Idealism. The Owl of Minerva 39 (1-2):95-134.
John Hund (1998). Hegel's Break with Kant: The Leap From Individual Psychology to Sociology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (2):226-243.
Franz Gabriel Nauen (1972). Revolution, Idealism and Human Freedom: Schelling, Hölderlin and Hegel and the Crisis of Early German Idealism. The Hague,Nijhoff.
Sally S. Sedgwick (ed.) (2000). The Reception of Kant's Critical Philosophy: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel. Cambridge University Press.
Karen Ng (2009). Hegel's Logic of Actuality. The Review of Metaphysics 63 (1):139-172.
Robert B. Pippin (1997). Idealism as Modernism: Hegelian Variations. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads10 ( #114,556 of 740,480 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,957 of 740,480 )
How can I increase my downloads?