David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Owl of Minerva 25 (1):111-116 (1993)
Hegel holds that members of a society can only be fully free and autonomous if they enjoy political representation. Hegel grants political representation to the landed aristocracy and to members of corporations. Causal day laborers fall outside both of these groups. Consequently, they lack political representation in Hegel’s state; hence they lack the political resources for full freedom and autonomy. This is a serious problem, but not so serious as Hegel’s marxist critics maintain. I propose two solutions based on Hegel’s institutional principles. First, day laborers typically work in the same industry, and often in the same factory. Once that regularity is established, such labor is no longer casual and it merits recognition through labor contracts and (ultimately) through corporate membership. Second, those workers who remain casual laborers deserve special attention from a government-sponsored agency which organizes and regularizes their training and job placement, and which represents their interests in Hegel’s Estates Assembly. I further suggest that Keynes’s public works strategy for moderating unemployment fits perfectly into Hegel’s institutional framework, and I show (contra Ilting) that Hegel’s exposition of the Crown is properly ordered. The Monarch is the organizational apex of Hegel’s government, but the Estates Assembly culminates Hegel’s program for achieving the political autonomy of individuals.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kenneth R. Westphal (2007). Normative Constructivism: Hegel's Radical Social Philosophy. SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):7-41.
Similar books and articles
Andrew Buchwalter (2012/2011). Dialectics, Politics, and the Contemporary Value of Hegel's Practical Philosophy. Routledge.
Shlomo Avineri (1972). Hegel's Theory of the Modern State. London,Cambridge University Press.
Walter Arnold Kaufmann (1970). Hegel's Political Philosophy. New York,Atherton Press.
Alasdair C. MacIntyre (1972). Hegel. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Alasdair C. MacIntyre (1976). Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press.
Dalia Nassar (2004). Heroes and Fanatics. Idealistic Studies 34 (2):199-214.
Steven B. Smith (1989). Hegel's Critique of Liberalism: Rights in Context. University of Chicago Press.
Andrew Chitty (1996). On Hegel, the Subject, and Political Justification. Res Publica 2 (2):181-203.
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1999). G.W.F. Hegel--Political Writings. Cambridge University Press.
Peter Singer (2001). Hegel: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Thom Brooks (2013/2009). Hegel's Political Philosophy: A Systematic Reading of the Philosophy of Right. Edinburgh University Press.
Terry P. Pinkard (1994). Hegel's Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason. Cambridge University Press.
Judith N. Shklar (1976). Freedom and Independence: A Study of the Political Ideas of Hegel's Phenomenology of Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Joshua Rayman (2005). Hegel's Critique of Representation. Idealistic Studies 35 (2-3):137-154.
Added to index2012-03-11
Total downloads17 ( #204,370 of 1,790,292 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #169,251 of 1,790,292 )
How can I increase my downloads?