‘Kant’s [Moral] Constructivism and Rational Justification’
Graduate studies at Western
In Pihlström & Williams Baiasu (ed.), Politics and Metaphysics in Kant. Wales University Press (2011)
|Abstract||This paper characterises concisely a key issue about rational justification which highlights an important achievement of Kant’s constructivist method for identifying and justifying basic norms: uniquely, it resolves the Pyrrhonian Dilemma of the Criterion. Kant’s constructivist method is both sound and significant because it is based on core principles of rational justification as such. Explicating this basis of Kant’s constructivism affords an illuminating and defensible explication of four key aspects of the autonomy of rational judgment, including our positive moral freedom; it shows how Kant’s constructivism is fundamentally social and it shows how Kant’s constructivism can readily accommodate historical factors which bear on the appropriateness and legitimacy of social and political institutions. All of these advantages are available without recourse to Kant’s transcendental idealism, and all of them respond to common complaints about or alleged objections to Kant’s practical philosophy.|
|Keywords||moral constructivism Dilemma of the Criterion rational justification|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kenneth R. Westphal (2011). ‘Urteilskraft, Gegenseitige Anerkennung Und Rationale Rechtfertigung’. In Hans-Dieter Klein (ed.), Ethik als prima philosophia? Königshausen & Neumann.
Paul Formosa (2013). Is Kant a Moral Constructivist or a Moral Realist? European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):170-196.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2007). Normative Constructivism: Hegel's Radical Social Philosophy. Sats – Nordic Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):7-41.
Kenneth R. Westphal (forthcoming). ‘Constructivism, Contractarianism and Basic Obligations: Kant and Gauthier’. In J.-C. Merle (ed.), Reading Kant’s Doctrine of Right.
Patrick Kain (2006). Constructivism, Intrinsic Normativity, and the Motivational Analysis Argument. In Heiner Klemme, Manfred Kuehn & Dieter Schönecker (eds.), Moralische Motivation. Kant und die Alternativen. (Kant-Forschungen 16). Meiner Verlag.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2005). ‘Kant, Hegel, and Determining Our Duties’. Jahrbuch für Recht and Ethik/Annual Review of Law & Ethics 13:335-354.
Carla Bagnoli, Constructivism in Metaethics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Steven Ross (2009). The End of Moral Realism? Acta Analytica 24 (1):43-61.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2009). Mutual Recognition and Rational Justification in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit. Dialogue 48 (04):753-99.
Mark LeBar (2008). Aristotelian Constructivism. Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (1):182-213.
Christina Hoff (1983). Kant's Invidious Humanism. Environmental Ethics 5 (1):63-70.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2012). ‘Norm Acquisition, Rational Judgment and Moral Particularism’. Theory and Research in Education 10 (1):3--25.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2010). From 'Convention' to 'Ethical Life': Hume's Theory of Justice in Post-Kantian Perspective. Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (1):105-132.
Alison Hills (2008). Kantian Value Realism. Ratio 21 (2):182–200.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-03-11
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?