David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Felix Larsson (ed.), Kapten Mnemos Kolumbarium. Philosophical Communications (2005)
A common misunderstanding is that there is something logically amiss with the classical square of opposition, and that the problem is related to Aristotle’s and medieval philosophers’ rejection of empty terms. But [Parsons 2004] convincingly shows that most of these philosophers did not in fact reject empty terms, and that, when properly understood, there are no logical problems with the classical square. Instead, the classical square, compared to its modern version, raises the issue of the existential import of words like all; a semantic issue. I argue that the modern square is more interesting than Parsons allows, because it presents, in contrast with the classical square, notions of negation that are ubiquitous in natural languages. This is an indirect logical argument against interpreting all with existential import. I also discuss some linguistic matters bearing on the latter issue.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Antonino Drago (2008). The Square of Opposition and the Four Fundamental Choices. Logica Universalis 2 (1):127-141.
Author unknown, Square of Opposition. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Terence Parsons, The Traditional Square of Opposition. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Terence Parsons (2008). Things That Are Right with the Traditional Square of Opposition. Logica Universalis 2 (1):3-11.
Valentin A. Bazhanov (2008). Non-Classical Stems From Classical: N. A. Vasiliev's Approach to Logic and His Reassessment of the Square of Opposition. [REVIEW] Logica Universalis 2 (1):71-76.
Mary Tiles & Yuan Jinmei (2004). Could the Aristotelian Square of Opposition Be Translated Into Chinese? Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 4 (1):137-149.
Andrew Schumann (2013). On Two Squares of Opposition: The Leśniewski's Style Formalization of Synthetic Propositions. [REVIEW] Acta Analytica 28 (1):71-93.
Michael V. Wedin (1990). Negation and Quantification in Aristotle. History and Philosophy of Logic 11 (2):131-150.
Dominique Luzeaux, Jean Sallantin & Christopher Dartnell (2008). Logical Extensions of Aristotle's Square. Logica Universalis 2 (1):167-187.
Stefania Bonfiglioli (2008). Aristotle's Non-Logical Works and the Square of Oppositions in Semiotics. Logica Universalis 2 (1):107-126.
Peter Bernhard (2008). Visualizations of the Square of Opposition. Logica Universalis 2 (1):31-41.
Luis Estrada-González (2008). Weakened Semantics and the Traditional Square of Opposition. Logica Universalis 2 (1):155-165.
Srecko Kovac (2012). Logical Opposition and Collective Decisions. In Jean-Yves Béziau & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Springer. 341--356.
Saloua Chatti & Fabien Schang (2013). The Cube, the Square and the Problem of Existential Import. History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (2):101 - 132.
Harvey Friedman & Michael Sheard (1989). The Equivalence of the Disjunction and Existence Properties for Modal Arithmetic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (4):1456-1459.
Added to index2012-11-25
Total downloads8 ( #160,876 of 1,096,481 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #139,663 of 1,096,481 )
How can I increase my downloads?