David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (1):39-62 (2005)
The article reflects upon Michael Krausz’s account of contemporary debates between singularity and pluralism in the determination ofrightness, and uses that occasion to ask after the larger course of which these debates are a part. Looking to the companion effort to determine truth and rightness at law, it finds telling echoes of those debates in the modem history of legal thought, and sketches that history to the end of drawing out its implications for the project at determining rightness more generally. These sobering implications, itsuggests, call us to rethink the question of the relation of rightness to ontology
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Wolfgang Künne (1993). Truth, Rightness, and Permanent Acceptability. Synthese 95 (1):107 - 117.
Holly M. Smith (2010). Subjective Rightness. Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (2):64-110.
Michael Krausz (1993). Rightness and Reasons: Interpretation in Cultural Practices. Cornell University Press.
Rafael De Clercq (2009). Scruton on Rightness of Proportion in Architecture. British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (4):405-414.
Alastair Norcross (1997). Good and Bad Actions. Philosophical Review 106 (1):1-34.
Steven Sverdlik (1996). Motive and Rightness. Ethics 106 (2):327-349.
Iskra Fileva (2008). The Neutrality of Rightness and the Indexicality of Goodness: Beyond Objectivity and Back Again. Ratio 21 (3):273-285.
Joseph Heath (1998). What is a Validity Claim? Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (4):23-41.
Alastair Norcross (2005). Contextualism for Consequentialists. Acta Analytica 20 (2):80-90.
Michael Krausz (1997). Rightness and Reasons: A Reply to Stecker. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (4):415-418.
Amy Morgan Schmitter (1996). Krausz, Michael. Rightness and Reasons: Interpretation in Cultural Practices. Review of Metaphysics 50 (1):165-167.
Trenton Merricks (2007). Truth and Ontology. Oxford University Press.
Jonathan Schaffer (2008). Truth and Fundamentality: On Merricks's Truth and Ontology. Philosophical Books 49 (4):302-316.
Johan Brännmark (2006). From Virtue to Decency. Metaphilosophy 37 (5):589-604.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads2 ( #337,488 of 1,096,817 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #273,068 of 1,096,817 )
How can I increase my downloads?