Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (3):343-363 (1984)
|Abstract||Does Nietzsche claim to know anything? Does he need to make such claims in order to fulfill his broader philosophical aims, in particular, to criticize religion and morality genealogically? Do his own epistemological views entitle him to make such claims? I defend affirmative answers to the first two of these questions and formulate several crucial issues involved in answering the third. These issues stem both from unresolved difficulties in available interpretations of Nietzsche and unexplored aspects of Nietzsche’s views. They include: the extent to which and the ways in which Nietzsche thinks that language inherently ‘falsifies’ the world, the importance of distinguishing several senses of ‘thing-in-itself’ and of ‘creation’ of truth in Nietzsche’s writings, the inadequacies of utilitarian or (vulgarly) pragmatic interpretations of Nietzsche’s views, and the apparent self-referential inconsistency of Nietzsche’s ‘perspectivism’. I hope that posing these issues will help focus controversies among divergent groups of Nietzsche’s interpreters.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Claude Nicholas Pavur (1998). Nietzsche Humanist. Marquette University Press.
Robert B. Pippin (ed.) (2012). Introductions to Nietzsche. Cambridge University Press.
Danielle Bromwich (2010). Clearing Conceptual Space for Cognitivist Motivational Internalism. Philosophical Studies 148 (3).
Frederick Rauscher (1997). How a Kantian Can Accept Evolutionary Metaethics. Biology and Philosophy 12 (3).
Keith Ansell Pearson (forthcoming). Nietzsche's Brave New World of Force: On Nietzsche's 1873 "Time Atom Theory" Fragment and the Matter of Boscovich's Influence on Nietzsche. Journal of Nietzsche Studies.
Joe Ward (forthcoming). Nietzsche's Value Conflict: Culture, Individual, Synthesis. Journal of Nietzsche Studies.
A. Ridley (2010). Perishing of the Truth: Nietzsche's Aesthetic Prophylactics. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (4):427-437.
Charles Pigden, Snare's Puzzle/Hume's Purpose: Non-Cognitivism and What Hume Was Really Up to with No-Ought-From-Is.
Nick Zangwill (2009). Non-Cognitivism and Motivation. In Constantine Sandis (ed.), New Essays on the Explanation of Action. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1984). Nietzsche's Sting and the Possibility of Good Philology. International Studies in Philosophy 16 (2):71-90.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #178,517 of 549,013 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,013 )
How can I increase my downloads?