David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 19 (3):279-297 (1997)
There has been an ongoing debate about the best approach in environmental ethics. Bryan Norton believes that “weak anthropocentrism” will yield the best results for public policy, and that it is the most defensible position. In contrast, I have argued that an ecocentric, holistic position is required to deal with the urgent environmental problems that face us, and that position is complemented by the ecosystem approach and complex systems theory. I have called this approach “the ethics of integrity,” and in this paper I show why this perspective suggests better solutions to difficult cases, for which “weak anthropocentrism” fails to provide an answer
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Laura Westra (1997). Why Norton's Approach is Insufficient for Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 19 (3):279-297.
Laura Westra (2009). Why Norton's Approach is Insufficient for Environmental Ethics. In Ben A. Minteer (ed.), Environmental Ethics. Temple University Press 279-297.
Bryan G. Norton (1984). Environmental Ethics and Weak Anthropocentrism. Environmental Ethics 6 (2):131-148.
Brian K. Steverson (2009). Contextualism and Norton's Convergence Hypothesis. In Ben A. Minteer (ed.), Environmental Ethics. Temple University Press 135-150.
Brian K. Steverson (1995). Contextualism and Norton's Convergence Hypothesis. Environmental Ethics 17 (2):135-150.
Bruce Morito (1999). Examining Ecosystem Integrity. Environmental Ethics 21 (1):59-73.
Bryan G. Norton (2000). Clearing the Way for a Life-Centered Ethic for Business. The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2:159-165.
Ronald Sandler (2003). The External Goods Approach to Environmental Virtue Ethics. Environmental Ethics 25 (3):279-293.
Ray Grizzle (1999). A Holistic Approach to Sustainability Based on Pluralism Stewardship. Environmental Ethics 21 (1):23-42.
Mikael Stenmark (2009). The Relevance of Environmental Ethical Theories for Policy Making. In Ben A. Minteer (ed.), Environmental Ethics. Temple University Press 135-148.
Ben A. Minteer (2001). Intrinsic Value for Pragmatists? Environmental Ethics 23 (1):57-75.
Katie McShane (2008). Convergence, Noninstrumental Value and the Semantics of 'Love': Reply to Norton. Environmental Values 17 (1):15-21.
Ben A. Minteer, Elizabeth A. Corley & Robert E. Manning (2004). Environmental Ethics Beyond Principle? The Case for a Pragmatic Contextualism. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (2):131-156.
Christopher B. Barrett & Ray Grizzle (1999). A Holistic Approach to Sustainability Based on Pluralism Stewardship. Environmental Ethics 21 (1):23-42.
Mikael Stenmark (2002). The Relevance of Environmental Ethical Theories for Policy Making. Environmental Ethics 24 (2):135-148.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads17 ( #204,029 of 1,790,069 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #426,086 of 1,790,069 )
How can I increase my downloads?