David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 2 (1):111 – 124 (1989)
A theory of syllogistic reasoning is proposed, derived from the medieval doctrine of 'distribution of terms'. This doctrine may or may not furnish an adequate ground for the logic of the syllogism but does appear to illuminate the psychological processes involved. Syllogistic thinking is shown to have its origins in the approach and avoidance behaviour of pre-verbal organisms and, in verbal (human) organisms, to bridge the gap between the intuitive grasp shown by most of us of the validity of simple logical arguments and the failure of intuition in more complex arguments that require resort to calculation. Some difficulties are considered affecting the use of syllogisms as experimental material. These include failure on the part of the investigator to take account of the fact that a syllogism is always part of a continuing argument in which the topic of the argument is known to all parties and the possibility that subjects may find ways of appearing to solve syllogisms without actually doing so.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
W. C. Kneale (1962/1984). The Development of Logic. Oxford University Press.
P. T. Geach (1972). Logic Matters. Oxford,Blackwell.
G. Spencer-Brown (1972). Laws of Form. New York,Julian Press.
I. M. Bocheński & Ivo Thomas (1963). A History of Formal Logic. Science and Society 27 (4):492-494.
Citations of this work BETA
Allen Newell (1992). SOAR as a Unified Theory of Cognition: Issues and Explanations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (3):464-492.
Mike Oaksford (1993). Mental Models and the Tractability of Everyday Reasoning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):360.
Philip N. Johnson-Laird & Ruth M. J. Byrne (1993). Précis of Deduction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):323.
Samuel Fillenbaum (1993). Deductive Reasoning: What Are Taken to Be the Premises and How Are They Interpreted? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):348.
Jon Barwise (1993). Everyday Reasoning and Logical Inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):337.
Similar books and articles
Thom Paul (2010). Three Conceptions of Formal Logic. Vivarium 48 (1-2):228-242.
Hugo Mercier & Guy Politzer (2011). Solving Categorical Syllogisms with Singular Premises. Thinking and Reasoning 14 (4):434-454.
Guy Politzer & Hugo Mercier (2008). Solving Categorical Syllogisms with Singular Premises. Thinking and Reasoning 14 (4):434 – 454.
Alison Capon, Simon Handley & Ian Dennis (2003). Working Memory and Reasoning: An Individual Differences Perspective. Thinking and Reasoning 9 (3):203 – 244.
Susanne Bobzien (1996). Stoic Syllogistic. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 14:133-92.
Bart Geurts (2003). Reasoning with Quantifiers. Cognition 86 (3):223--251.
Phil Corkum (forthcoming). Is Aristotle's Syllogistic a Logic? History and Philosophy of Logic.
Paul Thom (2010). Three Conceptions of Formal Logic. Vivarium 48 (1-2):228-242.
Norman E. Wetherick (1993). Psychology and Syllogistic Reasoning: Further Considerations. Philosophical Psychology 6 (4):423 – 440.
Added to index2009-03-08
Total downloads7 ( #291,535 of 1,724,890 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,138 of 1,724,890 )
How can I increase my downloads?