David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 6 (4):423 – 440 (1993)
Following an earlier paper (Wetherick, 1989), the analysis of syllogistic reasoning via the medieval doctrine of “distribution of terms” is pursued and completed. The doctrine was not originally presented as an explanation of syllogistic reasoning but turns out to furnish one. It is shown that: It is impossible to assert two propositions having a distributed middle term in common without, at the same time, tacitly asserting the valid conclusion, if any. When the middle term is distributed but no valid conclusion follows, this is a consequence of the distributional status of the subject and predicate terms. When the middle term is not distributed the propositions have nothing but a name in common. The logic of Spencer Brown (1969) is employed to show that logic is implicit in the behaviour of any organism that survives by making distinctions (e.g. between prey/non-prey; predator/non-predator). It is suggested that animal organisms answer this description by definition. Cognitive structures have evolved in the human organism so as to permit the conversion of habitual associations into universal propositions thus allowing formal logic and mathematics. This view appears to require a reversion to psychologism in logic, the consequences are considered and judged acceptable.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Guy Politzer, Jean‐Baptiste Henst, Claire Delle Luche & Ira A. Noveck (2006). The Interpretation of Classically Quantified Sentences: A Set‐Theoretic Approach. Cognitive Science 30 (4):691-723.
Similar books and articles
Thom Paul (2010). Three Conceptions of Formal Logic. Vivarium 48 (1-2):228-242.
Ernest W. Adams (2005). On a Proportionality Analysis of Syllogistic Private Reasoning. Synthese 146 (1-2):129 - 138.
Paul Thom (1982). Conversion of Propositions Containing Singular or Quantified Terms in Pseudo-Scotus. History and Philosophy of Logic 3 (2):129-149.
Alison Capon, Simon Handley & Ian Dennis (2003). Working Memory and Reasoning: An Individual Differences Perspective. Thinking and Reasoning 9 (3):203 – 244.
Don Emil Herget (1987). Non-Standard Categorical Syllogisms: Four That Leibniz Forgot. History and Philosophy of Logic 8 (1):1-13.
Paul Thom (2010). Three Conceptions of Formal Logic. Vivarium 48 (1-2):228-242.
Alison Bacon, Simon Handley & Stephen Newstead (2003). Individual Differences in Strategies for Syllogistic Reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 9 (2):133 – 168.
Bart Geurts (2003). Reasoning with Quantifiers. Cognition 86 (3):223--251.
Phil Corkum (forthcoming). Is Aristotle's Syllogistic a Logic? History and Philosophy of Logic.
N. E. Wetherick (1989). Psychology and Syllogistic Reasoning. Philosophical Psychology 2 (1):111 – 124.
Added to index2010-05-07
Total downloads7 ( #216,593 of 1,692,193 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #184,284 of 1,692,193 )
How can I increase my downloads?