On the New Foundational Crisis in Mathematics
In P. Mancosu (ed.), From Brouwer to Hilbert: The Debate on the Foundations of Mathematics in 1920s. Oxford University Press (1921)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSrećko Kovač (2008). Gödel, Kant, and the Path of a Science. Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):147-169.
Christopher Pincock (2009). Towards a Philosophy of Applied Mathematics. In Otávio Bueno & Øystein Linnebo (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Mathematics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Paolo Mancosu & T. A. Ryckman (2002). Mathematics and Phenomenology: The Correspondence Between O. Becker and H. Weyl. Philosophia Mathematica 10 (2):130-202.
Solomon Feferman, Relationships Between Constructive, Predicative and Classical Systems of Analysis.
Miriam Franchella (1994). Heyting's Contribution to the Change in Research Into the Foundations of Mathematics. History and Philosophy of Logic 15 (2):149-172.
John P. Burgess (1992). How Foundational Work in Mathematics Can Be Relevant to Philosophy of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:433 - 441.
Paul Benacerraf & Hilary Putnam (eds.) (1983). Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings. Cambridge University Press.
Alan Baker (2003). The Indispensability Argument and Multiple Foundations for Mathematics. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):49–67.
J. Ferreiros (2008). The Crisis in the Foundations of Mathematics. In T. Gowers (ed.), Princeton Companion to Mathematics. Princeton University Press.
Felix Mühlhölzer (2006). "A Mathematical Proof Must Be Surveyable" What Wittgenstein Meant by This and What It Implies. Grazer Philosophische Studien 71 (1):57-86.
Lawrence Sklar (1998). The Language of Nature is Mathematics—but Which Mathematics? And What Nature? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (3):241–261.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-03-20Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
