Political and economic arguments for corporate social responsibility: Analysis and a proposition regarding the csr agenda [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 86 (4):417 - 428 (2009)
Different perspectives on corporate social responsibility (CSR) exist, each with their own agenda. Some emphasise management responsibilities towards stakeholders, others argue that companies should actively contribute to social goals, and yet others reject a social responsibility of business beyond legal compliance. In addition, CSR initiatives relate to different issues, such as labour standards and corruption. This article analyses what types of CSR initiatives are supported by political and economic arguments. The distinction between different CSR perspectives and CSR issues on the one hand and between political and economic arguments on the other could help to advance the debate on the justification and welfare impact of CSR. It is argued that ordinary boundary conditions for business behaviour in a market economy provide support for some, but not all, CSR initiatives. This has implications for policy priorities. Building on the analysis, it is proposed that more attention should be paid to the behaviour of large multinational enterprises in their normal business operations and to CSR issues with a potentially large impact on market functioning
|Keywords||broader goals corporate social responsibility market failures market functioning multinational enterprises neo-liberal economics social contract stakeholder theory welfare impact|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Barbara Beliveau, Melville Cottrill & Hugh M. O'Neill (1994). Predicting Corporate Social Responsiveness: A Model Drawn From Three Perspectives. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (9):731 - 738.
Maria Lai-Ling Lam (2007). A Study of the Transfer of Corporate Social Responsibility From Well-Established Foreign Multinational Enterprises to Chinese Subsidiaries. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:343-363.
Lisa Whitehouse (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Views From the Frontline. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 63 (3):279 - 296.
Heledd Jenkins (2006). Small Business Champions for Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 67 (3):241 - 256.
Diana C. Robertson (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility and Different Stages of Economic Development: Singapore, Turkey, and Ethiopia. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):617 - 633.
Bernhard Mark-Ungericht & Richard Weiskopf (2007). Filling the Empty Shell. The Public Debate on CSR in Austria as a Paradigmatic Example of a Political Discourse. Journal of Business Ethics 70 (3):285 - 297.
Gerard I. J. M. Zwetsloot (2003). From Management Systems to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2-3):201 - 207.
C. B. Bhattacharya, Daniel Korschun & Sankar Sen (2009). Strengthening Stakeholder–Company Relationships Through Mutually Beneficial Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (2):257 - 272.
David Antony Detomasi (2008). The Political Roots of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (4):807 - 819.
Maria Grafström & Karolina Windell (2011). The Role of Infomediaries: CSR in the Business Press During 2000–2009. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 103 (2):221-237.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #73,391 of 1,004,651 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,123 of 1,004,651 )
How can I increase my downloads?