David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mind and Language 18 (5):447–477 (2003)
Grice (1957) drew a distinction between natural(N) and non–natural(NN) meaning, and showed how the latter might be characterised in terms of intentions and the recognition of intentions. Focussing on the role of natural signs and natural behaviours in communication, this paper makes two main points. First, verbal communication often involves a mixture of natural and non–natural meaning and there is a continuum of cases between showing and meaningNN. This suggests that pragmatics is best seen as a theory of intentional verbal communication rather than a theory of meaningNN. Second, some natural behaviours have a signalling function: they are, in effect, natural codes. Such behaviours do not fit easily into Grice's distinction between natural and non–natural meaning, which suggests it is not exhaustive.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Anita Avramides (1989). Meaning and Mind an Examination of a Gricean Account of Language. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
R. Carston (2002). Thoughts and Utterances. Blackwell.
Noam Chomsky (1988). Language and Problems of Knowledge. The MIT Press.
Noam Chomsky (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Robyn Carston (2008). Linguistic Communication and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Synthese 165 (3):321 - 345.
Mitchell S. Green (2009). Speech Acts, the Handicap Principle and the Expression of Psychological States. Mind and Language 24 (2):139-163.
Diane Blakemore (2013). Voice and Expressivity in Free Indirect Thought Representations: Imitation and Representation. Mind and Language 28 (5):579-605.
Similar books and articles
Korey D. Maas (2011). Natural Science, Natural Rights, and Natural Law : Abortion in Historical Perspective. In Robert C. Baker & Roland Cap Ehlke (eds.), Natural Law: A Lutheran Reappraisal. Concordia Pub. House
Steven Davis (1998). Grice on Natural and Non-Natural Meaning. Philosophia 26 (3-4):405-419.
Ellen Frankel, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (2000). Natural Law and Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
J. Budziszewski (2011). The Line Through the Heart: Natural Law as Fact, Theory, and Sign of Contradiction. Intercollegiate Studies Institute.
Daniel Hugo Rellstab (2008). Peirce for Linguistic Pragmaticists. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (2):pp. 312-345.
Henrik Syse (2007). Natural Law, Religion, and Rights: An Exploration of the Relationship Between Natural Law and Natural Rights, with Special Emphasis on the Teachings of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. St. Augustine's Press.
George Lakoff (1970). Linguistics and Natural Logic. Synthese 22 (1-2):151 - 271.
Richard Gray (2006). Natural Phenomenon Terms. Analysis 66 (290):141–148.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #100,874 of 1,699,670 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #77,273 of 1,699,670 )
How can I increase my downloads?