|Abstract||Is Language the Ultimate Artefact? (henceforth ILUA) was originally published alongside a paper by Andy Clark called Is Language Special? Some remarks on control, coding, and co-ordination (Clark 2004). One concern (among others) of the latter paper was to resist the argument of the former. In this short afterword, I shall attempt a counterresponse to Clark’s resistance. In so doing I hope to reveal, in a new and perhaps clearer way, what the most important issues really are in this (still unresolved) debate|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Kim Plunkett & Mark H. Johnson (1998). What Does It Mean to Claim That Something Is 'Innate'? Response to Clark, Harris, Lightfoot and Samuels. Mind and Language 13 (4):588-597.
Andy Clark (2005). Word, Niche and Super-Niche: How Language Makes Minds Matter More. Theoria 20 (54):255-268.
Glenn W. Harrison & Morten Igel Lau (2005). Is the Evidence for Hyperbolic Discounting in Humans Just an Experimental Artefact? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):657-657.
Robin Cooper (2003). Afterword. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (3):369-374.
Richard C. Francis (1990). Causes, Proximate and Ultimate. Biology and Philosophy 5 (4):401-415.
Marzia Soavi (2009). Antirealism and Artefact Kinds. Techné 13 (2):93-107.
Pawel Garbacz (2009). What is an Artefact Design? Techné 13 (2):137-149.
Andy Clark (2004). Is Language Special? Some Remarks on Control, Coding and Coordination. Language Sciences 26 (6):717-726.
M. Wheeler (2004). Is Language the Ultimate Artifact? Language Sciences 26 (6):688-710.
Added to index2010-07-26
Total downloads10 ( #106,438 of 549,196 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,196 )
How can I increase my downloads?