David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 129 (2):211-231 (2001)
I consider two threats to the idea that on-line intelligent behaviour (the production of fluid and adaptable responses to ongoing sensory input) must or should be explained by appeal to neurally located representations. The first of these threats occurs when extra-neural factors account for the kind of behavioural richness and flexibility normally associated with representation-based control. I show how this anti-representational challenge can be met, if we apply the thought that, to be a representational system, an action-oriented neural system must not only be the source of at least some of the observed behavioural richness and flexibility, it must also feature two architectural traits, namely arbitrariness and homuncularity. Unfortunately, however, this solution opens the door to our second threat to representation. The homuncularity condition will not be met by any system in which the causal contribution of each component is massively context-sensitive and variable over time. I end by discussing the empirical bet that biological nervous systems will not exhibit this style of causation.
|Keywords||Behavior Causation Metaphysics Representation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Martin Flament-Fultot (2014). On Genic Representations. Biological Theory 9 (2):149-162.
Similar books and articles
Rocco J. Gennaro (2008). Representation of a Representation: Reflections on Las Meninas. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (9):47-50.
Ángel García Rodríguez & Francisco Calvo Garzón (2010). Is Cognition a Matter of Representations?: Emulation, Teleology, and Time-Keeping in Biological Systems. Adaptive Behavior 18 (5):400-415.
Ruth G. Millikan (1989). Biosemantics. Journal of Philosophy 86 (July):281-97.
Rick Grush (1997). The Architecture of Representation. Philosophical Psychology 10 (1):5-23.
Shaun Gallagher (2008). Are Minimal Representations Still Representations? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (3):351 – 369.
Andy Clark & M. Wheeler (1999). Genie Representation: Reconciling Content and Causal Complexity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (1):103 - 135.
M. Wheeler & A. Clark (1999). Genic Representation: Reconciling Content and Causal Complexity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (1):103-135.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads56 ( #59,581 of 1,725,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #110,403 of 1,725,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?