David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):1006-1008 (2011)
In an article published recently in this journal Daniel Hill argues that it is unacceptable that British law allows doctors to refuse to terminate non-emergency pregnancies but not to refuse to refer given that many doctors who are opposed to non-emergency abortion will be opposed also to any action that aids non-emergency abortion, including the action of referral. In this reply, I argue that Hill’s argument fails to describe properly the correct function of the law, which has never been about ensuring people can exercise moral consistency in their behaviours.
|Keywords||abortion referral for abortion conscientious objection|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Joseph Raz (1986). The Morality of Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Hamish Stewart (2010). The Limits of the Harm Principle. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):17-35.
Joel Feinberg (1987). Offense to Others. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48 (1):147-153.
Daniel J. Hill (2010). Abortion and Conscientious Objection. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):344-350.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael Loughlin, Robyn Bluhm, Stephen Buetow, Ross E. G. Upshur, Maya J. Goldenberg, Kirstin Borgerson & Vikki Entwistle (2011). Virtue, Progress and Practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):839-846.
Similar books and articles
Carolyn McLeod (2008). Referral in the Wake of Conscientious Objection to Abortion. Hypatia 23 (4):pp. 30-47.
David F. Walbert (1973). Abortion, Society, and the Law. Cleveland [Ohio]Press of Case Western Reserve University.
Jan Deckers (2010). The Right to Life and Abortion Legislation in England and Wales: A Proposal for Change. Diametros 26:1-22.
Richard Schoenig (1998). Abortion, Christianity, and Consistency. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 5 (1):32-37.
Marcia Riordan (2008). Victorian Abortion Law Reform Bill 2008. Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 14 (2):7.
F. M. Kamm (1992). Creation and Abortion: A Study in Moral and Legal Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Kate Gleeson (2009). The Other Abortion Myth—the Failure of the Common Law. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):69-81.
Christopher Robert Kaczor (2010). The Ethics of Abortion: Women's Rights, Human Life, and the Question of Justice. Routledge.
A. Giubilini (2012). Abortion and the Argument From Potential: What We Owe to the Ones Who Might Exist. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):49-59.
Elliott Louis Bedford (2012). Abortion: At the Still Point of the Turning Conscientious Objection Debate. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 24 (2):63-82.
Marcia Riordan (2009). Chemical Abortion in Australia. Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 15 (2):6.
Robert M. Baird & Stuart E. Rosenbaum (eds.) (2001). The Ethics of Abortion: Pro-Life Vs. Pro-Choice. Prometheus Books.
Jim Stone (1995). Abortion as Murder?: A Response. Journal of Social Philosophy 26 (1):129-146.
D. Jabbari (1990). Abortion, Doctors and the Law: Some Aspects of the Legal Regulation of Abortion in England From 1803 to 1982. Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (3):164-165.
Added to index2011-11-14
Total downloads34 ( #115,004 of 1,793,064 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #79,554 of 1,793,064 )
How can I increase my downloads?