David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Conscience is oft-referred to yet not understood. This text develops a theory of cognition around a model of conscience, the ACTWith model. It represents a synthesis of results from contemporary neuroscience with traditional philosophy, building from Jamesian insights into the emergence of the self to narrative identity, all the while motivated by a single mechanism as represented in the ACTWith model. Emphasis is placed on clarifying historical expressions and demonstrations of conscience - Socrates, Heidegger, Kant, M.L. King - in light of the ACTWith model, while at once turning these resources to developing the basic architecture. In the end, this text aims to enrich moral theory by improving our understanding of moral cognition, while at once providing a useful tool in everyday moral practice and self-development.
|Keywords||conscience consciousness heidegger kant moral law narrative identity social philosophy cognitive science moral theory socrates|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John J. Hardt (2008). The Conscience Debate: Resources for Rapprochement From the Problem's Perceived Source. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):151-160.
J. David Velleman (1999). The Voice of Conscience. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (1):57–76.
Frank Schalow (1998). Language and the Social Roots of Conscience: Heidegger's Less Traveled Path. [REVIEW] Human Studies 21 (2):141-156.
Vasiliki Karavakou (2006). The Educational Demands of a Philosophical Theory of Moral Conscience in a Modern Democracy. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 4:65-71.
Jason J. Howard (2004). Kant and Moral Imputation. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):609-627.
Jens Timmermann (2006). Kant on Conscience, “Indirect” Duty, and Moral Error. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (3):293-308.
Edward Andrew & Peter Lindsay (2008). Are the Judgments of Conscience Unreasonable? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (2):235-254.
Added to index2009-12-14
Total downloads283 ( #1,840 of 1,689,222 )
Recent downloads (6 months)49 ( #2,138 of 1,689,222 )
How can I increase my downloads?