Curiosity was Framed

Abstract This paper explores the nature of curiosity from an epistemological point of view. First it motivates this exploration by explaining why epistemologists do and should care about what curiosity is. Then it surveys the relevant literature and develops a particular approach
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,709
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Dennis Whitcomb (2010). Curiosity Was Framed. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (3):664-687.
    Dennis Whitcomb (2010). Curiosity Was Framed. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (3):664-687.
    Axel Gelfert (forthcoming). Hume on Curiosity. British Journal for the History of Philosophy.
    Elias Baumgarten (2001). Curiosity as a Moral Virtue. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (2):169-184.
    Neil Tennant (1995). Paradoxes of Pure Curiosity. Theory and Decision 38 (3):321-330.
    Nicholas Maxwell (2001). Wisdom and Curiosity? I Remember Them Well. The Times Higher Education Supplement (1,488):14.
    Ilhan Inan (2010). Inostensible Reference and Conceptual Curiosity. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):21-41.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-01-09

    Total downloads

    2 ( #232,684 of 549,699 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,425 of 549,699 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums