Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):233-261 (2012)
|Abstract||Abstract As non-state actors, PMSCs are not embraced by traditional state-dominated doctrines of international law. However, international law has itself failed to keep pace with the evolution of states and state-based actors, to which strong Westphalian notions of sovereignty are no longer applicable. It is argued that these structural inadequacies stand in the way of international regulation of PMSCs, rather than defects in international human rights and humanitarian law per se. By analyzing understandings of legal responsibility, where such structural issues come to the fore, it is argued that, rather than attempting to resolve the essentially ideological dispute about the inherent functions of a state, regulatory regimes should focus on the positive obligations of states and PMSCs, and the interactions between them. Applying the results of this analysis, current and proposed regulatory regimes are evaluated and their shortcomings revealed|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kristine A. Huskey (2012). Accountability for Private Military and Security Contractors in the International Legal Regime. Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):193-212.
Marcus Hedahl (2012). Unaccountable: The Current State of Private Military and Security Companies. Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):175-192.
José L. Gómez del Prado (2012). A U.N. Convention to Regulate PMSCs? Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):262-286.
M. Kamminga, Final Report on the Impact of International Human Rights Law on General International Law.
Ana Filipa Vrdoljak, Cultural Rights: The Possible Impact of Private Military and Security Companies.
George Andreopoulos & Shawna Brandle (2012). Revisiting the Role of Private Military and Security Companies. Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):138-157.
Cristina Lafont (2010). Accountability and Global Governance: Challenging the State-Centric Conception of Human Rights. Ethics and Global Politics 3 (3).
Nina Seppala (2009). Business and the International Human Rights Regime: A Comparison of UN Initiatives. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 87 (2):401 - 417.
Serena Parekh (2011). Getting to the Root of Gender Inequality: Structural Injustice and Political Responsibility. Hypatia 26 (4):672-689.
Peter Muchlinski (2012). Implementing the New UN Corporate Human Rights Framework. Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (1):145-177.
Duane Windsor (2009). Developing a Global Regime for Human Rights. International Corporate Responsibility Series 4:83-105.
Margot E. Salomon & Foreword by Stephen P. Marks (2007). Global Responsibility for Human Rights: World Poverty and the Development of International Law. OUP Oxford.
James Franklin (2005). Risk-Driven Global Compliance Regimes in Banking and Accounting: The New Law Merchant. Law, Probability and Risk 4 (4):237-250.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-11-13
Total downloads1 ( #291,386 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?